中文版 | English

在结果中检索

GSTDTAP

浏览/检索结果: 共5条，第1-5条 帮助

限定条件    
已选(0)清除 条数/页：   排序方式：
A review of flexibility of residential electricity demand as climate solution in four EU countries 期刊论文
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 15 (7)
作者:  Mata, Erika;  Ottosson, Jonas;  Nilsson, Johanna
收藏  |  浏览/下载：18/0  |  提交时间：2020/08/18
demand side management  flexibility  grid edge  residential buildings  mitigation potentials  electricity demand  
Targeted policies can compensate most of the increased sustainability risks in 1.5 degrees C mitigation scenarios 期刊论文
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 13 (6)
作者:  Bertram, Christoph;  Luderer, Gunnar;  Popp, Alexander;  Minx, Jan Christoph;  Lamb, William F.;  Stevanovic, Miodrag;  Humpenoeder, Florian;  Giannousakis, Anastasis;  Kriegler, Elmar
收藏  |  浏览/下载：15/0  |  提交时间：2019/04/09
emission reduction policies  sustainable development goals (SDGs)  integrated assessment modeling  
Social cost of carbon pricing of power sector CO2: accounting for leakage and other social implications from subnational policies 期刊论文
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 13 (1)
作者:  Bistline, John E.;  Rose, Steven K.
收藏  |  浏览/下载：4/0  |  提交时间：2019/04/09
climate policy  social cost of carbon  emissions leakage  state-based regulations  regulatory impact analysis  energy-economic modeling  
Distributions of carbon pricing on extraction, combustion and consumption of fossil fuels in the global supply-chain 期刊论文
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 13 (1)
作者:  Karstensen, Jonas;  Peters, Glen
收藏  |  浏览/下载：5/0  |  提交时间：2019/04/09
global carbon price  carbon price on extraction  consumption-based emissions  global supply-chain  emissions embodied in trade  
Was it worthwhile? Where have the benefits of rooftop solar photovoltaic generation exceeded the cost? 期刊论文
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2017, 12 (9)
作者:  Vaishnav, Parth;  Horner, Nathaniel;  Azevedo, Ines L.
收藏  |  浏览/下载：5/0  |  提交时间：2019/04/09
distributed energy  solar photovoltaics  energy subsidies  energy and pollution  climate change  benefit cost analysis