Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.02.015 |
Messiness of forest governance: How technical approaches suppress politics in REDD plus and conservation projects | |
Myers, Rodd1,2,3,4; Larson, Anne M.1; Ravikumar, Ashwin1,5; Kowler, Laura F.1; Yang, Anastasia1,6; Trench, Tim1,7 | |
2018-05-01 | |
发表期刊 | GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS
![]() |
ISSN | 0959-3780 |
EISSN | 1872-9495 |
出版年 | 2018 |
卷号 | 50页码:314-324 |
文章类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | Peru; Indonesia; England; USA; Germany; Mexico |
英文摘要 | Reduction of Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD +) was originally conceived to address the global problem of climate change by reducing deforestation and forest degradation at national and subnational levels in developing countries. Since its inception, REDD + proponents have increasingly had to adapt global ideas to local demands, as the rollout process was met with on -the -ground realities, including suspicion and protest. As is typical in aid or 'development' projects conceived in the global North, most of the solutions advanced to improve REDD + tend to focus on addressing issues of justice (or 'fairness') in distributive terms, rather than addressing more inherently political objections to REDD + such as those based on rights or social justice. Using data collected from over 700 interviews in five countries with both REDD + and non-REDD + cases, we argue that the failure to incorporate political notions of justice into conservation projects such as REDD + results in 'messiness' within governance systems, which is a symptom of injustice and illegitimacy. We find that, first, conservation, payment for ecosystem services, and REDD + project proponents viewed problems through a technical rather than political lens, leading to solutions that focused on procedures, such as 'benefit distribution.' Second, focusing on the technical aspects of interventions came at the expense of political solutions such as the representation of local people's concerns and recognition of their rights. Third, the lack of attention to representation and recognition justices resulted in illegitimacy. This led to messiness in the governance systems, which was often addressed in technical terms, thereby perpetuating the problem. If messiness is not appreciated and addressed from appropriate notions of justice, projects such as REDD + are destined to fail. |
英文关键词 | REDD Conservation Technical and political solutions Environmental justice Legitimacy Anti-politics |
领域 | 气候变化 |
收录类别 | SCI-E ; SSCI |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000436223800026 |
WOS关键词 | ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ; CLIMATE-CHANGE ; RIGHTS ; INDONESIA ; CAMBODIA ; LESSONS ; PARTICIPATION ; RECOGNITION ; PAYMENTS ; SERVICES |
WOS类目 | Environmental Sciences ; Environmental Studies ; Geography |
WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Geography |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/37875 |
专题 | 气候变化 |
作者单位 | 1.CIP, Ctr Int Forestry Res CIFOR, Av La Molina 1895, Lima 12, Peru; 2.Dala Inst, Grand Slipi Tower 9G Floor, Jakarta Barat 11480, Indonesia; 3.Univ East Anglia, Global Environm Justice Grp, Sch Int Dev, Norwich Res Pk, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England; 4.Univ Gadjah Mada, Fac Forestry, Jl Agro 1, Yogyakarta, Indonesia; 5.Amherst Coll, Dept Environm Studies, 220 S Pleasant St, Amherst, MA 01002 USA; 6.Thuenen Inst Int Forestry & Forest Econ, Leuschnerstr 91, D-21031 Hamburg, Germany; 7.Univ Autonoma Chapingo, Postgrad Programme Reg Rural Dev, Diego de Mazariegos 85, San Cristobal de las Casa 29240, Chiapas, Mexico |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Myers, Rodd,Larson, Anne M.,Ravikumar, Ashwin,et al. Messiness of forest governance: How technical approaches suppress politics in REDD plus and conservation projects[J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS,2018,50:314-324. |
APA | Myers, Rodd,Larson, Anne M.,Ravikumar, Ashwin,Kowler, Laura F.,Yang, Anastasia,&Trench, Tim.(2018).Messiness of forest governance: How technical approaches suppress politics in REDD plus and conservation projects.GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS,50,314-324. |
MLA | Myers, Rodd,et al."Messiness of forest governance: How technical approaches suppress politics in REDD plus and conservation projects".GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS 50(2018):314-324. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论