Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
Top scientists support ARC reform | |
admin | |
2022-03-09 | |
发布年 | 2022 |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | 澳大利亚 |
领域 | 资源环境 |
正文(英文) |
![]() The current application of the ministerial veto in the Australian Research Council (ARC) introduces "a randomness in a system that should be designed to preclude it to the maximum extent possible," says the Academy, in a submission made this month to the Senate Standing Committees on Education and Employment. The submission to the Senate inquiry into the Australian Research Council Amendment (Ensuring Research Independence) Bill 2018 highlights the need for reform in ARC grant approvals. It argues that the veto "disregards" the capacity of the Council to make recommendations that include consideration of national interest and value for money, and lacks transparency and clarity. This echoes earlier statements by the Academy regarding the revelation on Christmas Eve 2021 that six ARC Discovery Projects had been rejected using ministerial veto. In February, Academy President John Shine joined the other presidents of Australia’s learned academies to call for the Government, the ARC and universities to work together to "uphold Australia’s reputation as a home and champion of international best practice research." |
URL | 查看原文 |
来源平台 | Australian Academy of Science |
文献类型 | 新闻 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/347186 |
专题 | 资源环境科学 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | admin. Top scientists support ARC reform. 2022. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
查看访问统计 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[admin]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[admin]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[admin]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论