Games researchers play: conceptual advancement versus validation strategies

GSTDTAP > 资源环境科学

DOI	10.1016/j.tree.2022.02.003
	Games researchers play: conceptual advancement versus validation strategies
	Frédérique Dubois:Pedro R. Peres-Neto
	2022-02-19
发表期刊	Trends in Ecology & Evolution\
出版年	2022
英文摘要	Conceptual advances and validation are critical to research, yet at odds. Using a game theoretical perspective, we show that a mixed strategy combining advances and validation, leads to increases in both individual researchers’ and societal gains. This win–win outcome can be used to design new research strategies, funding, and recognition standards.
领域	资源环境
URL	查看原文
引用统计	被引频次：1[WOS] [WOS记录] [WOS相关记录]
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/346692
专题	资源环境科学
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Frédérique Dubois:Pedro R. Peres-Neto. Games researchers play: conceptual advancement versus validation strategies[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution\,2022.
APA	Frédérique Dubois:Pedro R. Peres-Neto.(2022).Games researchers play: conceptual advancement versus validation strategies.Trends in Ecology & Evolution\.
MLA	Frédérique Dubois:Pedro R. Peres-Neto."Games researchers play: conceptual advancement versus validation strategies".Trends in Ecology & Evolution\ (2022).