GSTDTAP  > 资源环境科学
DOI10.1289/EHP7381
Health Effects of Naphthalene Exposure: A Systematic Evidence Map and Analysis of Potential Considerations for Dose–Response Evaluation
Erin E. Yost; Audrey Galizia; Dustin F. Kapraun; Amanda S. Persad; Suryanarayana V. Vulimiri; Michelle Angrish; Janice S. Lee; Ingrid L. Druwe
2021-07-12
发表期刊Environmental Health Perspectives
出版年2021
英文摘要

Abstract

Background:

Naphthalene is a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon that has been associated with health effects, including cancer. As the state of the science on naphthalene toxicity continues to evolve, updated toxicity reference value(s) may be required to support human health risk assessment.

Objectives:

We present a systematic evidence map of studies that could be used to derive toxicity reference value(s) for naphthalene.

Methods:

Human and animal health effect studies and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models were identified from a literature search based on populations, exposures, comparators, and outcomes (PECO) criteria. Human and animal studies meeting PECO criteria were refined to a smaller subset considered most informative for deriving chronic reference value(s), which are preferred for assessing risk to the general public. This subset was evaluated for risk of bias and sensitivity, and the suitability of each study for dose–response analysis was qualitatively assessed. Lowest observed adverse effect levels (LOAELs) were extracted and summarized. Other potentially relevant studies (e.g., mechanistic and toxicokinetic studies) were tracked as supplemental information but not evaluated further. Existing reference values for naphthalene are also summarized.

Results:

We identified 26 epidemiology studies and 16 animal studies that were considered most informative for further analysis. Eleven PBPK models were identified. The available epidemiology studies generally had significant risk of bias and/or sensitivity concerns and were mostly found to have low suitability for dose–response analysis due to the nature of the exposure measurements. The animal studies had fewer risk of bias and sensitivity concerns and were mostly found to be suitable for dose–response analysis.

Conclusion:

Although both epidemiological and animal studies of naphthalene provide weight of evidence for hazard identification, the available animal studies appear more suitable for reference value derivation. PBPK models and mechanistic and toxicokinetic data can be applied to extrapolate these animal data to humans, considering mode of action and interspecies metabolic differences. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP7381

领域资源环境
URL查看原文
引用统计
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/333632
专题资源环境科学
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Erin E. Yost,Audrey Galizia,Dustin F. Kapraun,et al. Health Effects of Naphthalene Exposure: A Systematic Evidence Map and Analysis of Potential Considerations for Dose–Response Evaluation[J]. Environmental Health Perspectives,2021.
APA Erin E. Yost.,Audrey Galizia.,Dustin F. Kapraun.,Amanda S. Persad.,Suryanarayana V. Vulimiri.,...&Ingrid L. Druwe.(2021).Health Effects of Naphthalene Exposure: A Systematic Evidence Map and Analysis of Potential Considerations for Dose–Response Evaluation.Environmental Health Perspectives.
MLA Erin E. Yost,et al."Health Effects of Naphthalene Exposure: A Systematic Evidence Map and Analysis of Potential Considerations for Dose–Response Evaluation".Environmental Health Perspectives (2021).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Erin E. Yost]的文章
[Audrey Galizia]的文章
[Dustin F. Kapraun]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Erin E. Yost]的文章
[Audrey Galizia]的文章
[Dustin F. Kapraun]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Erin E. Yost]的文章
[Audrey Galizia]的文章
[Dustin F. Kapraun]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。