GSTDTAP  > 气候变化
DOI10.1029/2020GL087839
Comparison and Verification of Point-Wise and Patch-Wise Localized Probability-Matched Mean Algorithms for Ensemble Consensus Precipitation Forecasts
Snook, Nathan1; Kong, Fanyou1; Clark, Adam2; Roberts, Brett2,3,4; Brewster, Keith A.1; Xue, Ming1,5
2020-05-30
发表期刊GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
ISSN0094-8276
EISSN1944-8007
出版年2020
卷号47期号:12
文章类型Article
语种英语
国家USA
英文摘要

When applied to precipitation on large forecast domains, the probability-matched ensemble mean (PM mean) can exhibit biases and artifacts due to using distributions from widely varying precipitation regimes. Recent studies have investigated localized PM (LPM) means, which apply the PM mean over local areas surrounding individual points or local patches, the latter requiring far fewer computational resources. In this study, point-wise and patch-wise LPM means are evaluated for 18-24-hr precipitation forecasts of a quasi-operational ensemble of 10 Finite-Volume Cubed-Sphere (FV3) forecast members. Point-wise and patch-wise LPM means exhibited similar forecast performance, outperforming PM and simple means in terms of fractions skill score and variance spectra while exhibiting superior bias characteristics when light smoothing was applied. Based on the results, an LPM mean using local patches of 60 x 60 km and calculation domains of 180 x 180 km is well suited for operational warm-season precipitation forecasting over the contiguous United States.


Plain Language Summary Weather and rainfall are often predicted using ensembles of numerical weather forecast models. The skill of the ensemble consensus is often better than any individual forecast, and valuable information about the range of possible outcomes and model uncertainty is gained. In this study, different methods for implementing a localized probability-matched mean (LPM mean) are examined. The LPM mean is designed to produce a more accurate consensus from a forecast ensemble while retaining local structures that other consensus methods fail to capture. Two LPM variations were examined for predicting accumulated precipitation-one computed at every model grid point and another on patches containing many nearby points. Both methods produced similar results and outperformed traditional ensemble consensus algorithms. The patch-based method took 1 to 2 orders of magnitude less time to compute. Operational weather providers should consider using the patch-based LPM mean algorithm to efficiently compute ensemble rainfall forecasts.


领域气候变化
收录类别SCI-E
WOS记录号WOS:000551464800043
WOS关键词IMPLEMENTATION ; PREDICT ; MODEL ; SKILL
WOS类目Geosciences, Multidisciplinary
WOS研究方向Geology
URL查看原文
引用统计
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/271663
专题气候变化
作者单位1.Univ Oklahoma, Ctr Anal & Predict Storms, Norman, OK 73019 USA;
2.NOAA, OAR, Natl Severe Storms Lab, Norman, OK USA;
3.Cooperat Inst Mesoscale Meteorol Studies, Norman, OK USA;
4.NOAA, NCEP, Storm Predict Ctr, Norman, OK USA;
5.Univ Oklahoma, Sch Meteorol, Norman, OK 73019 USA
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Snook, Nathan,Kong, Fanyou,Clark, Adam,et al. Comparison and Verification of Point-Wise and Patch-Wise Localized Probability-Matched Mean Algorithms for Ensemble Consensus Precipitation Forecasts[J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS,2020,47(12).
APA Snook, Nathan,Kong, Fanyou,Clark, Adam,Roberts, Brett,Brewster, Keith A.,&Xue, Ming.(2020).Comparison and Verification of Point-Wise and Patch-Wise Localized Probability-Matched Mean Algorithms for Ensemble Consensus Precipitation Forecasts.GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS,47(12).
MLA Snook, Nathan,et al."Comparison and Verification of Point-Wise and Patch-Wise Localized Probability-Matched Mean Algorithms for Ensemble Consensus Precipitation Forecasts".GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS 47.12(2020).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Snook, Nathan]的文章
[Kong, Fanyou]的文章
[Clark, Adam]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Snook, Nathan]的文章
[Kong, Fanyou]的文章
[Clark, Adam]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Snook, Nathan]的文章
[Kong, Fanyou]的文章
[Clark, Adam]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。