Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.03.011 |
Can REDD plus still become a market? Ruptured dependencies and market logics for emission reductions in Brazil | |
van der Hoff, Richard1,2; Rajao, Raoni2; Leroy, Pieter1 | |
2019-07-01 | |
发表期刊 | ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
![]() |
ISSN | 0921-8009 |
EISSN | 1873-6106 |
出版年 | 2019 |
卷号 | 161页码:121-129 |
文章类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | Netherlands; Brazil |
英文摘要 | During almost 20 years of political debate on the nature of Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES), these schemes have been characterized mostly as a non-market approach, even though attempts to transform them into market instruments has persistently recurred in these debates. One notable example is the materialization of Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD +) in Brazil, where a sustainable development discourse dominates national forest governance at the expense of a carbon commodification discourse. This research paper adopts a Foucauldian approach to plot the epistemological foundations of the market logics that still influence REDD + institutionalization in Brazil to a large extent and thereby reproduce what we define as a ruptured dependence on nature. More specifically, we recognize ruptured dependence in the three building blocks of market instruments, namely singularization, monetary valuation and appropriation. Our analysis shows that REDD + institutions have retained the singularization and monetary valuation of emission reductions, even though the appropriation processes have rejected the possibility of exchange and instead emphasized the national ownership of emission reductions. However, appropriation remains a highly politicized process that is sensitive to criticism and open to calls for alternative approaches that are closer to ruptured dependence. |
英文关键词 | PES REDD Ruptured dependence Market instruments Building blocks |
领域 | 资源环境 |
收录类别 | SCI-E ; SSCI |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000470049700013 |
WOS关键词 | ECOSYSTEM SERVICES ; ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ; MONETARY VALUATION ; PROPERTY-RIGHTS ; PAYMENTS ; EFFICIENCY ; DEFORESTATION ; PERSPECTIVE |
WOS类目 | Ecology ; Economics ; Environmental Sciences ; Environmental Studies |
WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Business & Economics |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/184437 |
专题 | 资源环境科学 |
作者单位 | 1.Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Fac Managementwetenschappen, Postbus 9108, NL-6500 HK Nijmegen, Netherlands; 2.Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Lab Gestao Serv Ambientais LAGESA, Ave Antonio Carlos 6627, BR-31270901 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | van der Hoff, Richard,Rajao, Raoni,Leroy, Pieter. Can REDD plus still become a market? Ruptured dependencies and market logics for emission reductions in Brazil[J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS,2019,161:121-129. |
APA | van der Hoff, Richard,Rajao, Raoni,&Leroy, Pieter.(2019).Can REDD plus still become a market? Ruptured dependencies and market logics for emission reductions in Brazil.ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS,161,121-129. |
MLA | van der Hoff, Richard,et al."Can REDD plus still become a market? Ruptured dependencies and market logics for emission reductions in Brazil".ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS 161(2019):121-129. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论