Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.07.025 |
Evidence of a Shared Value for Nature | |
Wainger, Lisa A.1; Helcoski, Ryan2,4; Farge, Kevin W.2,5; Espinola, Brandy A.2,6; Green, Gary T.3 | |
2018-12-01 | |
发表期刊 | ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
![]() |
ISSN | 0921-8009 |
EISSN | 1873-6106 |
出版年 | 2018 |
卷号 | 154页码:107-116 |
文章类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | USA |
英文摘要 | Ecosystem service analysis aims to expand the accounting of human values for nature, yet frequently ignores or obfuscates a category of human values with potentially large magnitude, namely nonuse or passive use values. These values represent the satisfaction derived from the protection or restoration of species, habitats and wilderness areas, even if people never use them in any tangible way. The shunting of nonuse values to the background of ecosystem service analysis appears, in part, to be an attempt to avoid the perceived elitism of environmental values. To examine whether such values are the purview of the elite, we explore three types of evidence of who holds nonuse values. We find that when people are asked to 1) commit money via stated preference instruments, 2) respond to tweets, or 3) express opinions via surveys they demonstrate a significant willingness to protect and restore natural resources, regardless of their own use of those resources. Such values are represented in all socio-demographic groups that encompass race, ethnicity, immigration status, income, political affiliation, geographic location, age or gender, although the magnitude can vary among groups. The implications are that omitting nonuse values in ecosystem service analysis will tend to underestimate values, particularly for remote sites with limited use, and fail to represent important tradeoffs. |
英文关键词 | Nonuse value Passive use value Ecosystem services Socio-demographic variability Social media |
领域 | 资源环境 |
收录类别 | SCI-E ; SSCI |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000446282700011 |
WOS关键词 | WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY ; STATED PREFERENCE VALUATION ; CONTINGENT VALUATION ; HYPOTHETICAL BIAS ; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES ; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS ; CHOICE EXPERIMENT ; ECONOMIC VALUES ; PASSIVE USE ; OIL-SPILL |
WOS类目 | Ecology ; Economics ; Environmental Sciences ; Environmental Studies |
WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Business & Economics |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/16042 |
专题 | 资源环境科学 |
作者单位 | 1.Univ Maryland, Chesapeake Biol Lab, Ctr Environm Sci, Solomons, MD 20688 USA; 2.Univ Maryland, Sustainable Dev & Conservat Biol Grad Program, College Pk, MD 20742 USA; 3.Univ Georgia, Warnell Sch Forestry & Nat Resources, Athens, GA 30602 USA; 4.Smithsonian Conservat Biol Inst, Conservat Ecol Ctr, Front Royal, VA 22630 USA; 5.Nature Conservancy, Legal Data Resource Ctr, Arlington, VA 22203 USA; 6.Univ Maryland, Environm Finance Ctr, College Pk, MD 20742 USA |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Wainger, Lisa A.,Helcoski, Ryan,Farge, Kevin W.,et al. Evidence of a Shared Value for Nature[J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS,2018,154:107-116. |
APA | Wainger, Lisa A.,Helcoski, Ryan,Farge, Kevin W.,Espinola, Brandy A.,&Green, Gary T..(2018).Evidence of a Shared Value for Nature.ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS,154,107-116. |
MLA | Wainger, Lisa A.,et al."Evidence of a Shared Value for Nature".ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS 154(2018):107-116. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论