Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.03.003 |
Why Should Ecosystem Services Be Governed to Support Poverty Alleviation? Philosophical Perspectives on Positions in the Empirical Literature | |
Lehmann, Ina1; Martin, Adrian2; Fisher, Janet A.3 | |
2018-07-01 | |
发表期刊 | ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
![]() |
ISSN | 0921-8009 |
EISSN | 1873-6106 |
出版年 | 2018 |
卷号 | 149页码:265-273 |
文章类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | Germany; England; Scotland |
英文摘要 | In light of trade-offs related to the allocation of ecosystem services we investigate the prevalent norms that are drawn upon to justify why ecosystem governance should prioritise poverty alleviation. We are specifically concerned with poverty alleviation because we consider this an urgent problem of justice. We review empirical literature on social trade-offs in ecosystem services governance in order to identify the prevalent conceptions of justice that inform scholarly assessments of current practice. We find that empirical studies do present specific notions of justice as desirable benchmarks for ecosystem services governance but that they rarely attempt to spell out the precise meaning of these notions or what makes them desirable. For those notions of justice that we identify in this literature - sufficientarianism, egalitarianism and participatory approaches - we draw on philosophical justice literature in order to better articulate the normative arguments that could support them and to be more precise about the kind of actions and expectations that they invoke. Moreover, we point to some striking normative silences in the ecosystem services literature. We conclude that the ecosystem services justice discourse would benefit from more conceptual clarity and a broader examination of different aspects of justice. |
英文关键词 | Ecosystem services Poverty alleviation Justice Sufficientarianism Egalitarianism Participation |
领域 | 资源环境 |
收录类别 | SCI-E ; SSCI |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000433014500023 |
WOS关键词 | TRADE-OFFS ; JUSTICE ; CONSERVATION ; CAPABILITIES ; ENVIRONMENT ; INEQUALITY ; EQUALITY ; WORLD ; LINKS |
WOS类目 | Ecology ; Economics ; Environmental Sciences ; Environmental Studies |
WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Business & Economics |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/15587 |
专题 | 资源环境科学 |
作者单位 | 1.Univ Bremen, Artec Sustainabil Res Ctr, Enrique Schmidt Str 7, D-28359 Bremen, Germany; 2.Univ East Anglia, Sch Int Dev, Global Environm Justice Grp, Norwich Res Pk, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England; 3.Univ Edinburgh, Geog & Lived Environm GeoSci, Drummond St, Edinburgh EH8 9XP, Midlothian, Scotland |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Lehmann, Ina,Martin, Adrian,Fisher, Janet A.. Why Should Ecosystem Services Be Governed to Support Poverty Alleviation? Philosophical Perspectives on Positions in the Empirical Literature[J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS,2018,149:265-273. |
APA | Lehmann, Ina,Martin, Adrian,&Fisher, Janet A..(2018).Why Should Ecosystem Services Be Governed to Support Poverty Alleviation? Philosophical Perspectives on Positions in the Empirical Literature.ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS,149,265-273. |
MLA | Lehmann, Ina,et al."Why Should Ecosystem Services Be Governed to Support Poverty Alleviation? Philosophical Perspectives on Positions in the Empirical Literature".ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS 149(2018):265-273. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论