Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
Apples, Oranges, and Antigravity? | |
admin | |
2019-05-10 | |
发布年 | 2019 |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | 法国 |
领域 | 地球科学 |
正文(英文) |
Would an antimatter orange have fallen on Newton's head like an apple? Physicists have not provided a serious answer to this question, for lack of being able to test it.
Since Galileo we have understood that in vacuum, a kilogram of feathers always falls at the same speed as a kilogram of lead. Technically, this means that the gravitational mass of an object (that which makes it fall) and its inertial mass (that which makes it resist being put into motion) are identical: this is what is known as the weak equivalence principle. It was based on this principle, and using increasingly sophisticated mathematical tools, that Newton—and later Einstein with the General Theory of Relativity—succeeded in describing and explaining gravitation. General relativity is a tried and tested theory in physics and cosmology, one whose predictions have never been shown to be wrong. They range from the demonstration of the expansion of the Universe during the 1920s, which was predicted by its equations, to the first direct observation of gravitational waves in 2014, whose existence was postulated by Einstein in 1915, in addition to the recent and incomparably precise confirmation—thanks to the Microscope satellite1—of the validity of the weak equivalence principle for matter. ![]() ![]()
Tom Kolossa / EyeEm/ Getty Images
Rotation of galaxies and the early universeA number of difficulties nevertheless remain, such as the need to invoke the mass of a mysterious dark matter in order to explain the rotational mode of galaxies, or of an equally mysterious dark energy to explain the behaviour of the early Universe. Furthermore, gravitation remains the only fundamental interaction that we cannot describe with the formalism of quantum field theory. Finally, not only has the gravitational behaviour of antimatter never been observed, but neither of the two theories is able to explain the almost complete absence of antimatter in the Universe. Dirac predicted the existence of antimatter in 1929. In 1932, Anderson discovered the antielectron (today known as the positron). The antiproton was later observed at the Bevatron2 in Berkeley in 1955 by Segré and Chamberlain. The presence of antimatter was detected in cosmic rays, and it was at CERN that antihydrogen, the first antimatter atom, was created in 1995. Progress in the study of antihydrogen over the last twenty-four years has made it possible to compare the transition energies of antihydrogen with those of hydrogen, and to thereby test one of the symmetries on which the Standard Model of quantum physics is based. The repulsion and conservation effect of energyWhat effect does gravity have on antimatter? Some theories in the 1980s posit a kind of antigravity that would manifest itself through a repulsion between masses of matter and antimatter! Such a phenomenon would be a major violation of the weak equivalence principle. In short, any experimental demonstration of such an effect would turn our understanding of fundamental physics upside down. Observing such a repulsion would also raise a problem with regard to the conservation of energy, although this could explain why we find almost no antimatter in our local Universe, as it would simply have been pushed away by matter. ![]() Hot and cold antiprotonsUnfortunately, the mass of antihydrogen is as low as that of hydrogen. As a result, the effect of the thermal agitation of atoms must be reduced as much as possible to achieve sufficiently precise measurements of free fall time within a reasonably sized vacuum chamber. This means cooling them to very low temperatures, which represents a considerable challenge because the antiproton was created by a high-energy collision that create it with an energy corresponding to a temperature 2 million times greater than the matter located in the centre of the Sun! The experiment I am working on fortunately will not stop there. To study the gravitational behaviour of antihydrogen at rest (GBAR), it seeks to produce antihydrogen at 10 micro-Kelvins. The GBAR project is based on an idea by Theodor Wolfgang Hänsch, laureate of the 2005 Nobel Prize in Physics, who proposed the production of the first antimatter object with three bodies: an antihydrogen+ ion consisting of an antiproton and two antielectrons. This represents a major challenge. No one has ever tried to produce such a three-body antimatter object. This requires building the world's most intense source of antielectrons, as well as recycling the antiprotons that do not interact. The analysis, views and opinions expressed in this section are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policies of the CNRS. Footnotes
|
URL | 查看原文 |
来源平台 | Centre national de la recherche scientifique |
文献类型 | 新闻 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/129493 |
专题 | 地球科学 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | admin. Apples, Oranges, and Antigravity?. 2019. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
查看访问统计 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[admin]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[admin]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[admin]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论