Comparison between two statistically based methods, and two physically based models developed to compute daily mean streamflow at ungaged locations in the Cedar River Basin, Iowa

GSTDTAP > 地球科学

报告编号	2013-5111
	Comparison between two statistically based methods, and two physically based models developed to compute daily mean streamflow at ungaged locations in the Cedar River Basin, Iowa
	Linhart, S. Mike; Nania, Jon F. jfnania@usgs.gov; Christiansen, Daniel E. dechrist@usgs.gov; Hutchinson, Kasey J. khutchin@usgs.gov; Sanders, Curtis L. Jr.; Archfield, Stacey A. sarch@usgs.gov
	2013
出版年	2013
页数	15
语种	英语
国家	美国
出版者	U.S. Geological Survey
领域	资源环境;地球科学
英文摘要	A variety of individuals from water resource managers to recreational users need streamflow information for planning and decisionmaking at locations where there are no streamgages. To address this problem, two statistically based methods, the Flow Duratio
URL	查看原文
来源平台	US Geological Survey (USGS)
文献类型	科技报告
条目标识符	http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/7966
专题	地球科学资源环境科学
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Linhart, S. Mike,Nania, Jon F. jfnania@usgs.gov,Christiansen, Daniel E. dechrist@usgs.gov,et al. Comparison between two statistically based methods, and two physically based models developed to compute daily mean streamflow at ungaged locations in the Cedar River Basin, Iowa:U.S. Geological Survey,2013.