Should ground-motion records be rotated to fault-normal/parallel or maximum direction for response history analysis of buildings?

GSTDTAP > 地球科学

报告编号	2012-1261
	Should ground-motion records be rotated to fault-normal/parallel or maximum direction for response history analysis of buildings?
	[null]
	2012
出版年	2012
页数	93
语种	英语
国家	美国
出版者	U.S. Geological Survey
领域	资源环境;地球科学
英文摘要	In the United States, regulatory seismic codes (for example, California Building Code) require at least two sets of horizontal ground-motion components for three-dimensional (3D) response history analysis (RHA) of building structures. For sites within 5 k
URL	查看原文
来源平台	US Geological Survey (USGS)
文献类型	科技报告
条目标识符	http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/7788
专题	地球科学资源环境科学
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	[null]. Should ground-motion records be rotated to fault-normal/parallel or maximum direction for response history analysis of buildings?:U.S. Geological Survey,2012.