GSTDTAP  > 资源环境科学
DOI10.7249/RR998
报告编号RR-998-OSD
360-Degree Assessments: Are They the Right Tool for the U.S. Military?
Chaitra M. Hardison; Mikhail Zaydman; Oluwatobi A. Oluwatola; Anna Rosefsky Saavedra; Thomas Bush; Heather Peterson; Susan G. Straus
2015
出版年2015
页数88
语种英语
国家美国
出版者RAND Corporation
领域资源环境
英文摘要In response to the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2014, which directed the Secretary of Defense to assess "the feasibility of including a 360-degree assessment [360] approach... as part of performance evaluation reports," the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness (OUSD/P&R) asked the RAND Corporation to provide an outside assessment of the advisability of using 360s for evaluation purposes in the military. In addition, OUSD/P&R also requested information on the role of 360s more broadly. Thus, this report explores the pros and cons of using 360s for evaluation and development purposes in the military.
英文关键词Performance Measurement Organizational Leadership Development Military Personnel Students
URL查看原文
来源平台Rand Corporation
引用统计
文献类型科技报告
条目标识符http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/4010
专题资源环境科学
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Chaitra M. Hardison,Mikhail Zaydman,Oluwatobi A. Oluwatola,et al. 360-Degree Assessments: Are They the Right Tool for the U.S. Military?:RAND Corporation,2015.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Chaitra M. Hardison]的文章
[Mikhail Zaydman]的文章
[Oluwatobi A. Oluwatola]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Chaitra M. Hardison]的文章
[Mikhail Zaydman]的文章
[Oluwatobi A. Oluwatola]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Chaitra M. Hardison]的文章
[Mikhail Zaydman]的文章
[Oluwatobi A. Oluwatola]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。