Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.1088/1748-9326/aa8f7b |
Ancillary health effects of climate mitigation scenarios as drivers of policy uptake: a review of air quality, transportation and diet co-benefits modeling studies | |
Chang, Kelly M.1; Hess, Jeremy J.1; Balbus, John M.2; Buonocore, Jonathan J.3; Cleveland, David A.4; Grabow, Maggie L.5; Neff, Roni6; Saari, Rebecca K.7; Tessum, Christopher W.8; Wilkinson, Paul9; Woodward, Alistair10; Ebi, Kristie L.11 | |
2017-11-01 | |
发表期刊 | ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS |
ISSN | 1748-9326 |
出版年 | 2017 |
卷号 | 12期号:11 |
文章类型 | Review |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | USA; Canada; England; New Zealand |
英文摘要 | Background: Significant mitigation efforts beyond the Nationally Determined Commitments (NDCs) coming out of the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement are required to avoid warming of 2 degrees C above pre-industrial temperatures. Health co-benefits represent selected near term, positive consequences of climate policies that can offset mitigation costs in the short term before the beneficial impacts of those policies on the magnitude of climate change are evident. The diversity of approaches to modeling mitigation options and their health effects inhibits meta-analyses and syntheses of results useful in policy-making. Methods/Design: We evaluated the range of methods and choices in modeling health co-benefits of climate mitigation to identify opportunities for increased consistency and collaboration that could better inform policy-making. We reviewed studies quantifying the health co-benefits of climate change mitigation related to air quality, transportation, and diet published since the 2009 Lancet Commission 'Managing the health effects of climate change' through January 2017. We documented approaches, methods, scenarios, health-related exposures, and health outcomes. Results/Synthesis: Forty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Air quality, transportation, and diet scenarios ranged from specific policy proposals to hypothetical scenarios, and from global recommendations to stakeholder-informed local guidance. Geographic and temporal scope as well as validity of scenarios determined policy relevance. More recent studies tended to use more sophisticated methods to address complexity in the relevant policy system. Discussion: Most studies indicated significant, nearer term, local ancillary health benefits providing impetus for policy uptake and net cost savings. However, studies were more suited to describing the interaction of climate policy and health and the magnitude of potential outcomes than to providing specific accurate estimates of health co-benefits. Modeling the health co-benefits of climate policy provides policy-relevant information when the scenarios are reasonable, relevant, and thorough, and the model adequately addresses complexity. Greater consistency in selected modeling choices across the health co-benefits of climate mitigation research would facilitate evaluation of mitigation options particularly as they apply to the NDCs and promote policy uptake. |
英文关键词 | greenhouse gases health co-benefits climate mitigation modeling diet air quality transportation |
领域 | 气候变化 |
收录类别 | SCI-E ; SSCI |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000424391800001 |
WOS关键词 | GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS ; EVIDENCE-INFORMED POLICY ; RED MEAT CONSUMPTION ; ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY ; GLOBAL BURDEN ; US ; RISK ; STRATEGIES ; MORTALITY ; DISEASE |
WOS类目 | Environmental Sciences ; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences |
WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/36548 |
专题 | 气候变化 |
作者单位 | 1.Univ Washington, Ctr Hlth & Global Environm, Seattle, WA 98105 USA; 2.NIEHS, Durham, NC USA; 3.Harvard Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Hlth & Global Environm, Landmark Ctr 4th Floor,Suite 415,401 Pk Dr, Boston, MA 02215 USA; 4.Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA; 5.Univ Wisconsin, Family Med & Community Hlth, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, 1100 Delaplaine Ct, Madison, WI 53715 USA; 6.Johns Hopkins Univ, Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA; 7.Univ Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada; 8.Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA; 9.Univ London, London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, London, England; 10.Univ Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; 11.LLC ClimAdapt, 424 Tyndall St, Los Altos, CA 94022 USA |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Chang, Kelly M.,Hess, Jeremy J.,Balbus, John M.,et al. Ancillary health effects of climate mitigation scenarios as drivers of policy uptake: a review of air quality, transportation and diet co-benefits modeling studies[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS,2017,12(11). |
APA | Chang, Kelly M..,Hess, Jeremy J..,Balbus, John M..,Buonocore, Jonathan J..,Cleveland, David A..,...&Ebi, Kristie L..(2017).Ancillary health effects of climate mitigation scenarios as drivers of policy uptake: a review of air quality, transportation and diet co-benefits modeling studies.ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS,12(11). |
MLA | Chang, Kelly M.,et al."Ancillary health effects of climate mitigation scenarios as drivers of policy uptake: a review of air quality, transportation and diet co-benefits modeling studies".ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS 12.11(2017). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论