Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.7249/RR139 |
报告编号 | RR-139-DH |
Alternatives to Peer Review in Research Project Funding: 2013 Update | |
Susan Guthrie; Benoit Guerin; Helen Wu; Sharif Ismail; Steven Wooding | |
2013 | |
出版年 | 2013 |
页数 | 42 |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | 美国 |
出版者 | RAND Corporation |
领域 | 资源环境 |
英文摘要 | Peer review is often considered the gold standard for reviewing research proposals. However, it is not always the best methodology for every research funding process. Public and private funders that support research as wide-ranging as basic science, defen |
英文关键词 | Science and Technology Program Evaluation Decisionmaking |
URL | 查看原文 |
来源平台 | Rand Corporation |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 科技报告 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/3567 |
专题 | 资源环境科学 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Susan Guthrie,Benoit Guerin,Helen Wu,et al. Alternatives to Peer Review in Research Project Funding: 2013 Update:RAND Corporation,2013. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论