Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
Carbon Market Watch reply to European Commission public consultation on the certification of carbon removals – EU rules | |
admin | |
2022-05-02 | |
出版年 | 2022 |
国家 | 国际 |
领域 | 气候变化 |
英文摘要 |
If done well the Carbon Removal Certification Mechanism (CDR-M) can determine what is actually Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) or not, and keep false solutions out of this field. Time and resources are scarce and must be invested in real removals, and not in CCU and temporary storage. These may have climate benefits (by crowding out fossil carbon or delaying emissions), but that does not make them equal to CDR. A key issue for the certification mechanism is not addressed in this questionnaire or in the related call for evidence: what are the certified ‘units’ or ‘methodologies’ going to be used for – where will demand come from? If the CRC-M leads to inclusion of removals in EU emission reduction policies (such as the ETS or ESR) then it will be a very dangerous distraction and a big mistake leading to, at best, a zero-sum game. |
URL | 查看原文 |
来源平台 | Carbon Market Watch |
文献类型 | 科技报告 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/349639 |
专题 | 气候变化 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | admin. Carbon Market Watch reply to European Commission public consultation on the certification of carbon removals – EU rules,2022. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
查看访问统计 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[admin]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[admin]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[admin]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论