GSTDTAP  > 地球科学
DOI10.1038/s41561-018-0073-0
Discrepancy between simulated and observed ethane and propane levels explained by underestimated fossil emissions
Dalsoren, Stig B.1,11; Myhre, Gunnar1; Hodnebrog, Oivind1; Myhre, Cathrine Lund2; Stohl, Andreas2; Pisso, Ignacio2; Schwietzke, Stefan3,4; Hoeglund-Isaksson, Lena5; Helmig, Detlev6; Reimann, Stefan7; Sauvage, Stephane8; Schmidbauer, Norbert2; Read, Katie A.9; Carpenter, Lucy J.9; Lewis, Alastair C.9; Punjabi, Shalini9; Wallasch, Markus10
2018-03-01
发表期刊NATURE GEOSCIENCE
ISSN1752-0894
EISSN1752-0908
出版年2018
卷号11期号:3页码:178-+
文章类型Article
语种英语
国家Norway; USA; Austria; Switzerland; France; England; Germany
英文摘要

Ethane and propane are the most abundant non-methane hydrocarbons in the atmosphere. However, their emissions, atmospheric distribution, and trends in their atmospheric concentrations are insufficiently understood. Atmospheric model simulations using standard community emission inventories do not reproduce available measurements in the Northern Hemisphere. Here, we show that observations of pre-industrial and present-day ethane and propane can be reproduced in simulations with a detailed atmospheric chemistry transport model, provided that natural geologic emissions are taken into account and anthropogenic fossil fuel emissions are assumed to be two to three times higher than is indicated in current inventories. Accounting for these enhanced ethane and propane emissions results in simulated surface ozone concentrations that are 5-13% higher than previously assumed in some polluted regions in Asia. The improved correspondence with observed ethane and propane in model simulations with greater emissions suggests that the level of fossil (geologic + fossil fuel) methane emissions in current inventories may need re-evaluation.


领域地球科学 ; 气候变化
收录类别SCI-E
WOS记录号WOS:000426311500010
WOS关键词HYDROCARBON INTERCOMPARISON EXPERIMENT ; GLOBAL ATMOSPHERIC ETHANE ; NATURAL-GAS PRODUCTION ; REGIONAL AIR-QUALITY ; METHANE EMISSIONS ; ANTHROPOGENIC EMISSIONS ; FUGITIVE EMISSIONS ; REACTIVE GASES ; MODEL ; CHEMISTRY
WOS类目Geosciences, Multidisciplinary
WOS研究方向Geology
引用统计
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/34932
专题地球科学
气候变化
作者单位1.CICERO, Oslo, Norway;
2.NILU, Kjeller, Norway;
3.Univ Colorado, CIRES, Boulder, CO 80309 USA;
4.NOAA, Earth Syst Res Lab, Global Monitoring Div, Boulder, CO USA;
5.Int Inst Appl Syst Anal, Laxenburg, Austria;
6.Univ Colorado, Inst Arctic & Alpine Res, Boulder, CO USA;
7.Swiss Fed Labs Mat Sci & Technol, Lab Air Pollut Environm Technol, Empa, Dubendorf, Switzerland;
8.Univ Lille, IMT Lille Douai, SAGE, Lille, France;
9.Univ York, Dept Chem, Wolfson Atmospher Chem Labs, York, N Yorkshire, England;
10.Messnetzzent Langen, Umweltbundesamt, Langen, Germany;
11.Inst Marine Res, His, Norway
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Dalsoren, Stig B.,Myhre, Gunnar,Hodnebrog, Oivind,et al. Discrepancy between simulated and observed ethane and propane levels explained by underestimated fossil emissions[J]. NATURE GEOSCIENCE,2018,11(3):178-+.
APA Dalsoren, Stig B..,Myhre, Gunnar.,Hodnebrog, Oivind.,Myhre, Cathrine Lund.,Stohl, Andreas.,...&Wallasch, Markus.(2018).Discrepancy between simulated and observed ethane and propane levels explained by underestimated fossil emissions.NATURE GEOSCIENCE,11(3),178-+.
MLA Dalsoren, Stig B.,et al."Discrepancy between simulated and observed ethane and propane levels explained by underestimated fossil emissions".NATURE GEOSCIENCE 11.3(2018):178-+.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Dalsoren, Stig B.]的文章
[Myhre, Gunnar]的文章
[Hodnebrog, Oivind]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Dalsoren, Stig B.]的文章
[Myhre, Gunnar]的文章
[Hodnebrog, Oivind]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Dalsoren, Stig B.]的文章
[Myhre, Gunnar]的文章
[Hodnebrog, Oivind]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。