Response to ‘Why <em>P</em>-values are not measures of evidence’ by D. Lakens

doi:10.1016/j.tree.2022.01.001

GSTDTAP > 资源环境科学

DOI	10.1016/j.tree.2022.01.001
	Response to ‘Why P-values are not measures of evidence’ by D. Lakens
	Stefanie Muff:Erlend B. Nilsen:Robert B. O’Hara:Chloé R. Nater
	2022-01-22
发表期刊	Trends in Ecology & Evolution\
出版年	2022
英文摘要	In our recent opinion article in TREE [1], we suggested that P-values should be interpreted gradually, rather than dichotomously, and with reference to degrees of evidence instead of to statistical significance. Gradual interpretation is consistent with advice given in several statistical text books [2,3] and a recent publication [4], but our suggestion of using language of evidence in relation to P-values has sparked vigorous discussion. This is not surprising, given that ‘evidence’ is not a mathematically defined concept.
领域	资源环境
URL	查看原文
引用统计
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/346081
专题	资源环境科学
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Stefanie Muff:Erlend B. Nilsen:Robert B. O’Hara:Chloé R. Nater. Response to ‘Why P-values are not measures of evidence’ by D. Lakens[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution\,2022.
APA	Stefanie Muff:Erlend B. Nilsen:Robert B. O’Hara:Chloé R. Nater.(2022).Response to ‘Why P-values are not measures of evidence’ by D. Lakens.Trends in Ecology & Evolution\.
MLA	Stefanie Muff:Erlend B. Nilsen:Robert B. O’Hara:Chloé R. Nater."Response to ‘Why P-values are not measures of evidence’ by D. Lakens".Trends in Ecology & Evolution\ (2022).