GSTDTAP  > 气候变化
COP26 agriculture and land takeaways
Claire McConnell
2021-11-15
出版年2021
国家欧洲
领域气候变化
英文摘要

Did COP26 succeed in raising the profile of action on agriculture and land?

Agriculture, forestry and other land use drives 23% of human-induced GHG emissions, making it the second-largest driver of climate change after energy. Addressing the agriculture, forestry and land-use sector will be key to achieving global emission reductions targets and limiting warming to 1.5C or below.

Despite this, COP26 did not have a dedicated day on agriculture, land use and food systems. Moreover, Nature Day and the World Leaders Summit saw agriculture and land use overshadowed by forestry. Given the strong link between agriculture and deforestation, driven in part by the associated change in land use, our efforts in this space need to be more holistic.

Why is policy lagging behind the science? Land and property rights and ownership, government support to farmers, and debates around animal proteins are politically sensitive topics. COP26 failed to engage with the politics of sustainable food production head-on, skirting the edges of difficult conversations on sustainable diets and food systems.

Concrete deliverables on agriculture and land use at COP26

What was missing on agriculture and land at COP26

  1. Pledges and commitments lacked concrete delivery plans and timelines for translating agreements into national legislation. What is needed now are the corresponding policy shifts to turn pledges into concrete actions.
  2. Several of them overlap yet lack any obvious mechanism to ensure work is joined up and initiatives are complementary.
  3. Nobody talked about livestock and dairy, despite references in the Koronivia draft conclusions. The issue is live and unanswered.
  4. The UN Agencies’ definition of what constitutes forested land is broad and fails to differentiate between a forest and a plantation. This means signatories of the GLD are, in theory, able to count soy and oil palm plantations as forested land. The Glasgow Declaration fails to specify whether signatories are required to halt all deforestation, or merely address illegal deforestation.

What’s next for agriculture and land ahead of COP27 and beyond?

It is encouraging that agriculture and land use are moving up the political agenda. Awareness is growing of the link between how and what we produce and consume, and the impact food systems have on the climate and environment. But policy still lags.

The UK Presidency should continue to build momentum towards COP27:

  • As part of Glasgow Breakthroughs UK will convene annual meetings of global leaders to track progress. This could become an annual Climate and Development ministerial, held until 2030, to take stock of progress made on the pledges made at Glasgow, encouraging revisions of NDCs where countries are off track.
  • Maintain the Cabinet Office COP Unit Nature Campaign team, to ensure pledges and commitments made under the UK Presidency are successfully handed over and taken up by incoming COP Presidency.
  • Continue to support the work of the Koronivia Joint Working Group on Agriculture, leading to an outcome from the Group at COP27, as well as a reference to agriculture and land in the overall COP27 statement.
URL查看原文
来源平台E3G
文献类型科技报告
条目标识符http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/341884
专题气候变化
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Claire McConnell. COP26 agriculture and land takeaways,2021.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Claire McConnell]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Claire McConnell]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Claire McConnell]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。