GSTDTAP  > 气候变化
DOIDOI10.1088/1748-9326/abe57b
From the Paris Agreement to corporate climate commitments: evaluation of seven methods for setting 'science-based' emission targets
Anders Bjørn; Shannon Lloyd; Damon Matthews
2021-04-22
发表期刊Environmental Research Letters
出版年2021/04/22
英文摘要

While large companies routinely announce greenhouse gas emissions targets, few have derived targets based on global climate goals. This changed in 2015 with the creation of the science based targets (SBTs) initiative, which provides guidelines for setting emission targets in line with the temperature goal of the Paris Agreement. SBTs have now been set by more than 500 companies. Methods for setting such targets are not presented in a comparable way in target-setting guidelines and concerns that certain methods may lead to overshoot of the temperature goal have not been investigated. Here, we systematically characterize and compare all seven broadly applicable target-setting methods and quantify the balance between collective corporate SBTs and global allowable emissions for individual methods and different method mixes. We use a simplified global production scenario composed of eight archetypical companies to evaluate target-setting methods across a range of company characteristics and global emission scenarios. The methods vary greatly with respect to emission allocation principles, required company variables and embedded global emission scenarios. Some methods treat companies largely the same, while others differentiate between company types based on geography, economic sector, projected growth rate or baseline emission intensity. The application of individual target-setting methods as well as different mixes of methods tend to result in an imbalance between time-integrated aggregated SBTs and global allowable emissions. The sign and size of this imbalance is in some cases sensitive to the shape of the global emission pathway and the distribution of variables between the company archetypes. We recommend that the SBT initiative (a) use our SBT method characterisation to present methods in a systematic way, (b) consider our emission imbalance analysis in its method recommendations, (c) disclose underlying reasons for its method recommendations, and (d) require transparency from companies on the calculation of established SBTs.

领域气候变化
URL查看原文
引用统计
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/324004
专题气候变化
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Anders Bjørn,Shannon Lloyd,Damon Matthews. From the Paris Agreement to corporate climate commitments: evaluation of seven methods for setting 'science-based' emission targets[J]. Environmental Research Letters,2021.
APA Anders Bjørn,Shannon Lloyd,&Damon Matthews.(2021).From the Paris Agreement to corporate climate commitments: evaluation of seven methods for setting 'science-based' emission targets.Environmental Research Letters.
MLA Anders Bjørn,et al."From the Paris Agreement to corporate climate commitments: evaluation of seven methods for setting 'science-based' emission targets".Environmental Research Letters (2021).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Anders Bjørn]的文章
[Shannon Lloyd]的文章
[Damon Matthews]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Anders Bjørn]的文章
[Shannon Lloyd]的文章
[Damon Matthews]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Anders Bjørn]的文章
[Shannon Lloyd]的文章
[Damon Matthews]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。