Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.1002/2016JD025886 |
Important global and regional differences in aerosol cloud-albedo effect estimates between simulations with and without prognostic aerosol microphysics | |
Kodros, J. K.; Pierce, J. R. | |
2017-04-16 | |
发表期刊 | JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES |
ISSN | 2169-897X |
EISSN | 2169-8996 |
出版年 | 2017 |
卷号 | 122期号:7 |
文章类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | USA |
英文摘要 | Aerosol-cloud interactions are among the most uncertain climate forcings, in part due to the strong sensitivity of cloud droplet number concentration (CDNC) to changes in the size distribution of potential cloud condensation nuclei. Despite this sensitivity of simulated aerosol-cloud interactions to variations in size-resolved aerosol concentrations being well established, many chemistry-climate and chemical-transport models do not include explicit treatment of the aerosol size distribution. We use a global chemical-transport model to estimate the aerosol cloud-albedo effect (CAE) due to anthropogenic emissions with prognostic sectional aerosol microphysics and compare this to the CAE calculated when the simulated aerosol mass of each species is remapped onto a prescribed size distribution. We find that although both the prescribed and prognostic methods compare similarly well with present-day size-distribution observations, there are substantial differences in the relative CDNC and CAE due to anthropogenic emissions. When using the prognostic size-distribution method, anthropogenic emissions yield a 25-75% larger increase in CDNC over most land masses but a 50-75% smaller increase in some remote-marine regions than in the prescribed size-distribution methods. Simulations using the prognostic scheme yield a global mean anthropogenic CAE of -0.87Wm(-2), while the simulations with the prescribed scheme predict -0.66Wm(-2). In South America and South Asia, differences in the CAE exceed 3.0Wm(-2). These differences suggest that simulations with prescribed size-distribution mapping are unable to capture regional and temporal variability in size-resolved aerosol number and thus may lead to biases in estimates of the CAE. |
英文关键词 | aerosol microphysics size distribution radiative forcing indirect effect modeling |
领域 | 气候变化 |
收录类别 | SCI-E |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000400172000019 |
WOS关键词 | CONDENSATION NUCLEI ; ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY ; SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS ; MODEL DESCRIPTION ; CLIMATE MODELS ; GLOMAP-MODE ; NUCLEATION ; PARAMETERIZATION ; REPRESENTATION ; PARTICLES |
WOS类目 | Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences |
WOS研究方向 | Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/32261 |
专题 | 气候变化 |
作者单位 | Colorado State Univ, Dept Atmospher Sci, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Kodros, J. K.,Pierce, J. R.. Important global and regional differences in aerosol cloud-albedo effect estimates between simulations with and without prognostic aerosol microphysics[J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES,2017,122(7). |
APA | Kodros, J. K.,&Pierce, J. R..(2017).Important global and regional differences in aerosol cloud-albedo effect estimates between simulations with and without prognostic aerosol microphysics.JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES,122(7). |
MLA | Kodros, J. K.,et al."Important global and regional differences in aerosol cloud-albedo effect estimates between simulations with and without prognostic aerosol microphysics".JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES 122.7(2017). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
查看访问统计 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[Kodros, J. K.]的文章 |
[Pierce, J. R.]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[Kodros, J. K.]的文章 |
[Pierce, J. R.]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[Kodros, J. K.]的文章 |
[Pierce, J. R.]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论