Sound Impact Studies: A Reply to Risch <em>et al</em>.

doi:10.1016/j.tree.2021.01.012

GSTDTAP > 资源环境科学

DOI	10.1016/j.tree.2021.01.012
	*Sound Impact Studies: A Reply to Risch et al.*
	Frank Thomsen:Arthur N. Popper:Anthony D. Hawkins
	2021-02-19
发表期刊	Trends in Ecology & Evolution\
出版年	2021
英文摘要	We welcome the response to our paper [1] by Risch et al. [2] and value that they broadly agree with our suggestions on the main approach to sound impact assessments. The primary differences between our views lie with the very purpose of writing our article. That is, while we argue for a science-based approach to mitigation and getting (substantially) more data to decide how to mitigate, Risch et al. argue for mitigation ‘for the sake of mitigation’. At the same time, our perspectives are not that different in that we would agree that until we have more data, it is reasonable to do some mitigation based on extrapolating from other data.
领域	资源环境
URL	查看原文
引用统计
文献类型	期刊论文
条目标识符	http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/315682
专题	资源环境科学
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Frank Thomsen:Arthur N. Popper:Anthony D. Hawkins. Sound Impact Studies: A Reply to Risch et al.[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution\,2021.
APA	Frank Thomsen:Arthur N. Popper:Anthony D. Hawkins.(2021).Sound Impact Studies: A Reply to Risch et al..Trends in Ecology & Evolution\.
MLA	Frank Thomsen:Arthur N. Popper:Anthony D. Hawkins."Sound Impact Studies: A Reply to Risch et al.".Trends in Ecology & Evolution\ (2021).