Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
New insights into polar observing systems using numerical models | ||||
admin | ||||
2021-01-08 | ||||
发布年 | 2021 | |||
语种 | 英语 | |||
国家 | 欧洲 | |||
领域 | 地球科学 ; 气候变化 | |||
正文(英文) |
Irina Sandu, ECMWF Physical Processes Team Leader, and François Massonnet, F.R.S.-FNRS Research Associate at the Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Belgium Polar regions have received increased attention in recent years, due in great part to the dramatic changes observed in these regions – just think for example of the pronounced Arctic warming and sea ice decline in recent years (Figure 1)! Clearly, it is becoming more pressing than ever to improve both predictive skill and monitoring capabilities in polar regions and we highlight some relevant scientific developments in this blog. Furthermore, we are calling for contributions to a special collection in QJRMS to gather studies highlighting the impact of polar observations on predictive skill in polar regions and beyond.
Figure 1: Arctic sea ice extent (1979–2020) estimated from passive microwave satellite observations. Coloring is done according to the value of the minimum sea ice extent for each year. Data source: National Snow and Ice Data Center Sea Ice Index. A commonly made – and yet incorrect – assumption is that polar regions are void of observations. It is true that conventional observations are sparser north of the 70°N parallel than south of it, for example. Conventional observations include: those gathered by national meteorological services through radiosonde launches, surface observations or deployment of buoys in the ocean or over the sea ice. However, in terms of sounding satellite data, polar regions are sampled at higher temporal frequency than any other region on the globe, thanks to the fact that Low Earth Orbit (or polar-orbiting) satellites pass over the pole at each orbit. For example, the number of observations assimilated in the ECMWF Integrated Forecasting System in a period of 12 hours from one of these satellites is up to 8 to 10 times larger north of 70°N than in the mid-latitudes. For channels peaking in the stratosphere, the difference is even more striking.
Figure 2: Number of observations assimilated in the ECMWF operational forecasting system from MetOp‐A AMSU‐A channel 5 (peaking around 850 hPa) in (a) June–September 2016 and (b) December 2017 to March 2018. Note that 60°N is indicated as a solid black line. Adapted from Lawrence et al. (2019). Observations are a key ingredient for accurate predictions from hours to years ahead. They are used in numerical weather prediction (NWP) systems to create the initial conditions for weather forecasts, using data assimilation techniques which blend observations and models to create the best possible reconstruction of the current state of the Earth system (the analysis, or reanalysis when we talk about past states). With the ever-growing interest in polar regions, several questions related to the role of polar observations for predictive skill naturally arise and beg to be answered, such as:
Coordinated numerical experimentationThese questions were recently thoroughly explored in the H2020 APPLICATE project and in the framework of the World Meteorological Organization's (WMO) Polar Prediction Project (PPP). A community effort was made to understand the role of existing polar observations and how to maximise their use in numerical weather and climate prediction systems, and also to guide the design of future observing systems in polar regions. This effort relied on coordinated numerical experimentation with state-of-the-art prediction systems. This experimentation focused on two aspects:
The impact of atmospheric observations on short- and medium-range weather forecastsObserving system experiments (OSEs) were carried out in which certain atmospheric observations in polar regions are withdrawn (denied) from the data assimilation process when creating the initial conditions for weather forecasts. These OSEs, coordinated in the framework of PPP and APPLICATE, were performed at several operational weather centres, including ECMWF, Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC), the German Weather Service (DWD) and Met Norway. This helped us understand the impact of Arctic observations in different forecasting systems. These OSEs covered the special observing periods of WMO’s Year of Polar Prediction (YOPP) and the analysis focused mainly on the impact of Arctic observations. The results highlighted the value of Arctic observations for short- and medium-range forecast skill, showing that:
The impact of sea ice initialisation on predictions a few months ahead (weeks to months)Based upon a range of methods, from numerical experimentation with various modelling systems to analysis of state-of-the-art datasets (such as climate reanalyses), work done in APPLICATE has highlighted that satellite observations of sea ice are not optimally used either. For example, Arctic sea ice reanalyses are well constrained when it comes to their areal extent, because large-scale concentration of sea ice is easily assimilated in models; but are highly scattered for thickness which is not yet routinely assimilated. Recent work has demonstrated the benefit of assimilating sea ice thickness information for seasonal Arctic sea ice predictions. Changes in sea ice thickness have larger spatial coherence, so a limited number of well-placed in-situ monitoring stations could be sufficient to estimate the large-scale changes in sea ice thickness and volume at interannual time scales, especially if this new data is complemented by improving existing satellite retrievals for which large uncertainties remain. Synergistic investments in observing and numerical prediction systems is keyThe efforts led in APPLICATE and the Polar Prediction Project demonstrated that numerical models can be successfully used to:
The clear message is that investment in observing systems must be carried out synergistically with the investment in numerical prediction systems. Investment in prediction systems (coupled modelling, use of observations, data assimilation and ensemble prediction techniques) may be at least as important as investments in observations themselves, in particular in polar regions which face specific challenges in each of these aspects. These challenges limit the extent to which satellite observations can contribute to creating accurate initial conditions for weather forecasts, as well as an accurate, consistent and comprehensive depiction of past conditions through long-term reanalyses. For example, the suboptimal use of microwave observations is possibly related to:
Increasing the uptake of satellite data over all surfaces (as well as in all-sky conditions) in the Integrated Forecasting System is one of the priorities highlighted in the recently approved ECMWF Strategy for 2021–2030. Improving the use of microwave data over snow and sea ice would, for example, also benefit future reanalyses such as those produced by the Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5, CARRA) for time periods as far back as 1979, when the first microwave sounding instrument was launched. The topic of polar observing system design is triggering a lot of interest in the community, as shown by the various scientific articles (example 1, example 2), meetings, working groups and initiatives developed over recent years. Avenues to increase the uptake of polar observations in NWP systems continue to be explored. Many of these issues were discussed in a session at the European Polar Science Week. A special collection in the Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological SocietyIn response to the pressing scientific questions highlighted, a special collection has now been opened in QJRMS to gather studies highlighting the impact of polar observations on predictive skill in polar regions and beyond, from weather to climate time scales. The first two papers in this collection are summarising the results of the OSEs performed at ECMWF. This special issue also welcomes OSE studies covering longer time scales (e.g. those analysing the impact of degrading initial oceanic and/or sea ice initial conditions on the predictive skill at sub-seasonal to seasonal time scales), as well as studies that use numerical experimentation to explore the possible added value on predictive skill of recently available or hypothetical observations (for which instruments are not deployed yet). AcknowledgementsMany colleagues from various institutions across the globe contributed to the work summarised in this blog. In particular we would like to thank Niels Bormann, Heather Lawrence, Leandro Ponsoni, Jonathan Day, Peter Bauer, Roger Randriamampianina, Stephane Laroche, Emmanuel Poan, Alexander Cress, Ed Blockley, Daniela Flocco, Ed Hawkins, François Montagner, Samantha Burgess, Jorn Kristiansen, Martin Vancoppenolle, Pablo Ortega, Juan Acosta, as well as Thomas Jung, the chair of WMO PPP.
Top banner image: Mike Watson Images/moodboard/Thinkstock
| |||
URL | 查看原文 | |||
来源平台 | European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts | |||
文献类型 | 新闻 | |||
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/310040 | |||
专题 | 地球科学 气候变化 | |||
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | admin. New insights into polar observing systems using numerical models. 2021. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
个性服务 |
推荐该条目 |
保存到收藏夹 |
查看访问统计 |
导出为Endnote文件 |
谷歌学术 |
谷歌学术中相似的文章 |
[admin]的文章 |
百度学术 |
百度学术中相似的文章 |
[admin]的文章 |
必应学术 |
必应学术中相似的文章 |
[admin]的文章 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论