Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
| DOI | 10.1016/j.tree.2020.09.005 |
| Clarifying Terrestrial Recycling Pathways | |
| Tom R. Bishop:Hannah M. Griffiths:Louise A. Ashton:Paul Eggleton:Joel S. Woon:Catherine L. Parr | |
| 2020-10-01 | |
| 发表期刊 | Trends in Ecology & Evolution\
 |
| 出版年 | 2020 |
| 英文摘要 | Pausas and Bond [1] argue that there are three major pathways by which the carbon and nutrients assimilated by plants are recycled through ecosystems: microbial decomposition, vertebrate herbivory, and wildfires. This framework has three principles. First, that each pathway recycles nutrients into plant-available forms. Second, that each pathway is broadly equivalent in that they consume ‘biomass’. Third, that the dominance of each pathway varies under different environmental conditions. We welcome the reframing of terrestrial recycling pathways in this way, but have identified three areas where the ‘Three Pathways Framework’ could be built upon: |
| 领域 | 资源环境 |
| URL | 查看原文 |
| 引用统计 | |
| 文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
| 条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/298018 |
| 专题 | 资源环境科学 |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Tom R. Bishop:Hannah M. Griffiths:Louise A. Ashton:Paul Eggleton:Joel S. Woon:Catherine L. Parr. Clarifying Terrestrial Recycling Pathways[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution\,2020. |
| APA | Tom R. Bishop:Hannah M. Griffiths:Louise A. Ashton:Paul Eggleton:Joel S. Woon:Catherine L. Parr.(2020).Clarifying Terrestrial Recycling Pathways.Trends in Ecology & Evolution\. |
| MLA | Tom R. Bishop:Hannah M. Griffiths:Louise A. Ashton:Paul Eggleton:Joel S. Woon:Catherine L. Parr."Clarifying Terrestrial Recycling Pathways".Trends in Ecology & Evolution\ (2020). |
| 条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 | |||||
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
修改评论