Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.1088/1748-9326/ab6394 |
What is important for achieving 2 degrees C? UNFCCC and IPCC expert perceptions on obstacles and response options for climate change mitigation | |
Kornek, Ulrike1,2; Flachsland, Christian1,3; Kardish, Chris3; Levi, Sebastian1; Edenhofer, Ottmar1,2,4 | |
2020-02-01 | |
发表期刊 | ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS |
ISSN | 1748-9326 |
出版年 | 2020 |
卷号 | 15期号:2 |
文章类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | Germany |
英文摘要 | Global mitigation efforts remain insufficient to limit the global temperature increase to well below 2 degrees C. While a growing academic literature analyzes this problem, perceptions of which obstacles inhibit goal attainment and which responses might be most effective seem to differ widely. This makes prioritization and agreement on the way forward difficult. To inform prioritization in global climate policy and research agendas, we present quantitative data on how 917 experts from the IPCC and the UNFCCC perceive the importance of different obstacles and response options for achieving 2 degrees C. On average, respondents consider opposition from special interest groups the most important obstacle and technological R&D the most important response. Our survey also finds that the majority of experts perceives a wide range of issues as important, supporting an agenda that is inclusive in terms of coverage. Average importance ratings differ between experts from the Global North and South, suggesting that balanced representation in global fora and regionally differentiated agendas are important. In particular, opposition from special interest groups is a top priority among experts from North America, Europe and Oceania. Investigating the drivers of individual importance ratings, we find little difference between experts from the IPCC and the UNFCCC, while expert's perceptions correlate with their academic training and their national scientific, regulatory, and financial contexts. |
英文关键词 | climate change mitigation obstacles and responses expert elicitation agenda setting |
领域 | 气候变化 |
收录类别 | SCI-E ; SSCI |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000520427300001 |
WOS关键词 | PARIS AGREEMENT |
WOS类目 | Environmental Sciences ; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences |
WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/279169 |
专题 | 气候变化 |
作者单位 | 1.Mercator Res Inst Global Commons & Climate Change, Torgauer Str 12-15, D-10829 Berlin, Germany; 2.Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res, Telegraphenberg 31 D, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany; 3.Hertie Sch Governance, Friedrichstr 180, D-10117 Berlin, Germany; 4.Tech Univ Berlin, Str 17 Juni 135, D-10623 Berlin, Germany |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Kornek, Ulrike,Flachsland, Christian,Kardish, Chris,et al. What is important for achieving 2 degrees C? UNFCCC and IPCC expert perceptions on obstacles and response options for climate change mitigation[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS,2020,15(2). |
APA | Kornek, Ulrike,Flachsland, Christian,Kardish, Chris,Levi, Sebastian,&Edenhofer, Ottmar.(2020).What is important for achieving 2 degrees C? UNFCCC and IPCC expert perceptions on obstacles and response options for climate change mitigation.ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS,15(2). |
MLA | Kornek, Ulrike,et al."What is important for achieving 2 degrees C? UNFCCC and IPCC expert perceptions on obstacles and response options for climate change mitigation".ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS 15.2(2020). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论