Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.03.001 |
Spatial alternatives for Green Infrastructure planning across the EU: An ecosystem service perspective | |
Vallecillo, Sara1; Polce, Chiara1; Barbosa, Ana1,2; Castillo, Carolina Perpina3; Vandecasteele, Ine3; Rusch, Graciela M.4; Maes, Joachim1 | |
2018-06-01 | |
发表期刊 | LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING |
ISSN | 0169-2046 |
EISSN | 1872-6062 |
出版年 | 2018 |
卷号 | 174页码:41-54 |
文章类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | Italy; France; Norway |
英文摘要 | Target 2 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 aims at the deployment of Green Infrastructure (GI) and the restoration of at least 15% of degraded ecosystems. We assess different alternatives for the spatial planning of GI and ecosystem restoration across the European Union by using spatial conservation prioritization tools. We compared three different scenarios for the identification of priority areas in which the ecosystem service potential, beneficiaries (i.e. people) and ecosystem condition play different roles. As an example of GI restoration, we also assessed the cost-effectiveness of removal of invasive alien species in the areas prioritized under each scenario. The comparative assessment of the spatial alternatives for GI shows synergies and conflicts. We found that GI could be efficiently established close to densely populated areas, since high multi-functionality is delivered in these locations (close to human settlements). However, restoration costs, such as the removal of invasive alien species, were higher in such areas given the influence of urban pressures. We also found that GI prioritized in areas under poor ecosystem condition would require a larger spatial extent of implementation, due to a lower ecosystem service potential per unit area. Given the scarcity of resources for investment in GI and ecosystem restoration, win-win situations should be identified where GI designation can deliver several policy objectives simultaneously. The prioritization framework we have presented here could also be applied at the country or regional level to support local planning. |
英文关键词 | Multi-functionality Ecosystem service potential Beneficiaries Habitat conservation status Ecosystem condition Ecosystem restoration |
领域 | 资源环境 |
收录类别 | SCI-E ; SSCI |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000430756400006 |
WOS关键词 | ALIEN PLANT INVASIONS ; SUPPLY-AND-DEMAND ; CONSERVATION ; BIODIVERSITY ; RESTORATION ; EUROPE ; PRIORITIZATION ; MANAGEMENT ; LAND ; INDICATOR |
WOS类目 | Ecology ; Environmental Studies ; Geography ; Geography, Physical ; Regional & Urban Planning ; Urban Studies |
WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Geography ; Physical Geography ; Public Administration ; Urban Studies |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/25311 |
专题 | 资源环境科学 |
作者单位 | 1.European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Directorate Sustainable Resources D, Land Resources Unit, Via Fermi 2749,TP 270, I-21027 Ispra, VA, Italy; 2.UNESCO, Intergovt Oceanog Commiss, Marine Policy & Reg Coordinat Sect, 7 Pl Fontenoy, F-75352 Paris, France; 3.European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Directorate Growth & Innovat B, Terr Dev Unit, Via Fermi 2749,TP 270, I-21027 Ispra, VA, Italy; 4.Norwegian Inst Nat Res, Post Box 5685 Sluppen, NO-7485 Trondheim, Norway |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Vallecillo, Sara,Polce, Chiara,Barbosa, Ana,et al. Spatial alternatives for Green Infrastructure planning across the EU: An ecosystem service perspective[J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING,2018,174:41-54. |
APA | Vallecillo, Sara.,Polce, Chiara.,Barbosa, Ana.,Castillo, Carolina Perpina.,Vandecasteele, Ine.,...&Maes, Joachim.(2018).Spatial alternatives for Green Infrastructure planning across the EU: An ecosystem service perspective.LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING,174,41-54. |
MLA | Vallecillo, Sara,et al."Spatial alternatives for Green Infrastructure planning across the EU: An ecosystem service perspective".LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING 174(2018):41-54. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论