Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.08.015 |
Nature strikes back or nature heals? Can perceptions of regrowth in a post-agricultural landscape in South-eastern Australia be used in management interventions for biodiversity outcomes? | |
Stelling, Fleur; Allan, Catherine; Thwaites, Rik | |
2017-02-01 | |
发表期刊 | LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING |
ISSN | 0169-2046 |
EISSN | 1872-6062 |
出版年 | 2017 |
卷号 | 158 |
文章类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | Australia |
英文摘要 | Throughout the world spontaneous growth of vegetation (regrowth) often results from land use change such as reduced or ceased agricultural activity. Abundant and extensive regrowth typically has significant implications such as risks to human wellbeing (e.g. wildfire), and opportunities for low cost broad scale land restoration and biodiversity conservation. Management of regrowth may be contentious due to differing views amongst stakeholders. Developing effective management strategies for biodiversity outcomes requires clear understanding of social perceptions of regrowth. This paper is based upon 53 semi-structured interviews exploring stakeholder perceptions, views and management of regrowth in a post-agricultural landscape in central Victoria, Australia. Aspects of discourse in particular narratives (themes of discussion) and frames (philosophical perspectives) enabled interpretation of how different stakeholders perceived their changing landscape. Stakeholders typically viewed the shrubby regrowth through one of three frames expressed through a range of narratives that conveyed meaning: "Control" a negative interpretation of the regrowth, "Accept" a positive interpretation; and "Ambivalent" -a fusion of the Control and Accept frames. As frames profoundly influence behaviours, we suggest using the frames and narratives identified in the research to develop interventions that enable biodiversity outcomes from the regrowth. Social acceptability of regrowth will be fostered if the interventions acknowledge stakeholder concerns congruent with the three frames identified in particular as expressed by the 'use', 'nature' and 'restoration' narratives which span the three frames. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. |
英文关键词 | Land abandonment Afforestation Encroachment Regrowth Narratives Frames |
领域 | 资源环境 |
收录类别 | SCI-E ; SSCI |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000390076100018 |
WOS关键词 | RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ; LAND ABANDONMENT ; CONSERVATION ; VEGETATION ; WILDERNESS ; COMMUNITY ; RESPONSES ; REALITY ; CULTURE ; VALUES |
WOS类目 | Ecology ; Environmental Studies ; Geography ; Geography, Physical ; Regional & Urban Planning ; Urban Studies |
WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Geography ; Physical Geography ; Public Administration ; Urban Studies |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/25231 |
专题 | 资源环境科学 |
作者单位 | Charles Sturt Univ, POB 789, Albury, NSW, Australia |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Stelling, Fleur,Allan, Catherine,Thwaites, Rik. Nature strikes back or nature heals? Can perceptions of regrowth in a post-agricultural landscape in South-eastern Australia be used in management interventions for biodiversity outcomes?[J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING,2017,158. |
APA | Stelling, Fleur,Allan, Catherine,&Thwaites, Rik.(2017).Nature strikes back or nature heals? Can perceptions of regrowth in a post-agricultural landscape in South-eastern Australia be used in management interventions for biodiversity outcomes?.LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING,158. |
MLA | Stelling, Fleur,et al."Nature strikes back or nature heals? Can perceptions of regrowth in a post-agricultural landscape in South-eastern Australia be used in management interventions for biodiversity outcomes?".LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING 158(2017). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论