Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.06.007 |
User fees displace low-income outdoor recreationists | |
Lamborn, Chase C.; Smith, Jordan W.1,2; Burr, Steven W. | |
2017-11-01 | |
发表期刊 | LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING |
ISSN | 0169-2046 |
EISSN | 1872-6062 |
出版年 | 2017 |
卷号 | 167 |
文章类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | USA |
英文摘要 | The arguments for, or against, the use of user fees at outdoor recreation settings are often based upon philosophical, moral, and ethical grounds. Empirically-grounded research on the debate has been sparse. In this study, we report on a unique natural experiment comparing the incomes of individuals visiting very similar outdoor recreation settings which differ only in their requirement of a marginal user fee. Our comparison of the incomes of outdoor recreationists using the settings requiring a fee versus those that do not suggest user fees do play an important role in how low-income individuals choose outdoor recreation settings. Low-income outdoor re creationists tended to choose non-fee settings when they are available and if they support similar activities and opportunities as settings which require a fee. Low-income outdoor recreationists' aversion of settings which require a fee is not a product of their inability to pay the fee, but rather a product of their unwillingness to pay the fee. Low-income outdoor recreationists reported traveling over three times as far to reach non-fee settings relative to comparable settings which require a fee. If user fees are being considered as a visitor management tool, land-use and outdoor recreation planners should not only expect a shift in the socioeconomic composition of visitors to the areas where the fee will be enforced, they should also anticipate displacement and increased use at nearby non-fee settings. Recreation managers should avoid requiring fees at all outdoor recreation settings within an area to ensure displacement does not become exclusion. |
英文关键词 | Outdoor recreation Economic equality Substitution Displacement Low-income Visitor management |
领域 | 资源环境 |
收录类别 | SCI-E ; SSCI |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000412959400016 |
WOS关键词 | PLACE ATTACHMENT ; SITE PREFERENCE ; CHOICE MODEL ; SPECIALIZATION ; WILDERNESS ; DEMAND ; IMPACT ; MOTIVATION ; PARKS ; AREA |
WOS类目 | Ecology ; Environmental Studies ; Geography ; Geography, Physical ; Regional & Urban Planning ; Urban Studies |
WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Geography ; Physical Geography ; Public Administration ; Urban Studies |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/25119 |
专题 | 资源环境科学 |
作者单位 | 1.Utah State Univ, Inst Outdoor Recreat & Tourism, 5215 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322 USA; 2.Utah State Univ, Dept Environm & Soc, 5215 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322 USA |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Lamborn, Chase C.,Smith, Jordan W.,Burr, Steven W.. User fees displace low-income outdoor recreationists[J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING,2017,167. |
APA | Lamborn, Chase C.,Smith, Jordan W.,&Burr, Steven W..(2017).User fees displace low-income outdoor recreationists.LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING,167. |
MLA | Lamborn, Chase C.,et al."User fees displace low-income outdoor recreationists".LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING 167(2017). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论