Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.1038/s41467-020-15414-6 |
Taking stock of national climate policies to evaluate implementation of the Paris Agreement | |
Roelfsema, Mark1; van Soest, Heleen L.1,2; Harmsen, Mathijs1,2; van Vuuren, Detlef P.1,2; Bertram, Christoph3; den Elzen, Michel2; Hoehne, Niklas4,5; Iacobuta, Gabriela4; Krey, Volker6; Kriegler, Elmar3; Luderer, Gunnar3,7; Riahi, Keywan6; Ueckerdt, Falko3; Despres, Jacques8; Drouet, Laurent9; Emmerling, Johannes9; Frank, Stefan6; Fricko, Oliver6; Gidden, Matthew6,10; Humpenoeder, Florian3; Huppmann, Daniel6; Fujimori, Shinichiro11; Fragkiadakis, Kostas12; Gi, Keii13; Keramidas, Kimon8; Koberle, Alexandre C.14,15; Reis, Lara Aleluia9; Rochedo, Pedro14; Schaeffer, Roberto14; Oshiro, Ken11; Vrontisi, Zoi12; Chen, Wenying16; Iyer, Gokul C.17; Edmonds, Jae17; Kannavou, Maria12; Jiang, Kejun18; Mathur, Ritu19; Safonoy, George20; Vishwanathan, Saritha Sudharmma21,22 | |
2020-04-29 | |
发表期刊 | NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
![]() |
ISSN | 2041-1723 |
出版年 | 2020 |
卷号 | 11期号:1 |
文章类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | Netherlands; Germany; Austria; Spain; Italy; Japan; Greece; Brazil; England; Peoples R China; USA; India; Russia |
英文摘要 | Many countries have implemented national climate policies to accomplish pledged Nationally Determined Contributions and to contribute to the temperature objectives of the Paris Agreement on climate change. In 2023, the global stocktake will assess the combined effort of countries. Here, based on a public policy database and a multi-model scenario analysis, we show that implementation of current policies leaves a median emission gap of 22.4 to 28.2 GtCO(2)eq by 2030 with the optimal pathways to implement the well below 2 degrees C and 1.5 degrees C Paris goals. If Nationally Determined Contributions would be fully implemented, this gap would be reduced by a third. Interestingly, the countries evaluated were found to not achieve their pledged contributions with implemented policies (implementation gap), or to have an ambition gap with optimal pathways towards well below 2 degrees C. This shows that all countries would need to accelerate the implementation of policies for renewable technologies, while efficiency improvements are especially important in emerging countries and fossil-fuel-dependent countries. To evaluate the effectiveness of current national policies in achieving global temperature targets is important but a systematic multi-model evaluation is still lacking. Here the authors identified a reduction of 3.5 GtCO(2) eq of current national policies relative to a baseline scenario without climate policies by 2030 due to the increasing low carbon share of final energy and the improving final energy intensity. |
领域 | 地球科学 ; 气候变化 ; 资源环境 |
收录类别 | SCI-E ; SSCI |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000531855500026 |
WOS关键词 | CO2 EMISSIONS ; TARGETS ; PROGRESS ; TIME |
WOS类目 | Multidisciplinary Sciences |
WOS研究方向 | Science & Technology - Other Topics |
URL | 查看原文 |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/249493 |
专题 | 资源环境科学 |
作者单位 | 1.Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Princetonlaan 8a, NL-3584 CB Utrecht, Netherlands; 2.PBL Netherlands Environm Assessment Agcy, POB 30314, NL-2500 GH The Hague, Netherlands; 3.Leibniz Assoc, Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res PIK, POB 601203, D-14412 Potsdam, Germany; 4.Wageningen Univ & Res, Environm Syst Anal Grp, POB 47, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands; 5.NewClimate Inst, Clever Str 13-15, D-50668 Cologne, Germany; 6.Int Inst Appl Syst Anal IIASA, Schlosspl 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria; 7.Tech Univ Berlin, Chair Global Energy Syst, Strage 17 Juni 135, D-10623 Berlin, Germany; 8.European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Edificio Expo,C Inca Garcilaso 3, Seville 41092, Spain; 9.Ctr Euro Mediterraneo Cambiamenti Climat, RFF CMCC European Inst Econ & Environm EIEE, Via Bergognone 34, I-20144 Milan, Italy; 10.Climate Analyt, Ritterstr 3, Berlin, Germany; 11.Kyoto Univ, Nishikyo Ku, C1-3 Kyotodaigaku Katsura, Kyoto, Japan; 12.Natl Tech Univ Athens, Inst Commun & Comp Syst, E3M Lab, Iroon Politechniou St,15 773 Zografou Campus, Athens, Greece; 13.Res Inst Innovat Technol Earth, Kyoto 6190292, Japan; 14.Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, COPPE, POB 68565, BR-21941914 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil; 15.Imperial Coll London, Grantham Inst, Exhibit Rd, London SW7 2AZ, England; 16.Tsinghua Univ, Inst Energy Environm & Econ, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China; 17.Pacific Northwest Natl Lab, Joint Global Change Res Inst, 5825 Univ Res Court,Suite 3500, College Pk, MD 20740 USA; 18.Natl Dev & Reform Commiss, Energy Res Inst, B1505,Guohong Bldg,Jia 11, Beijing 100038, Peoples R China; 19.India Habitat Ctr, Energy & Resources Inst TERI, Lodhi Rd, New Delhi 3, India; 20.Natl Res Univ Higher Sch Econ HSE, 20 Myasnitskaya St, Moscow 101000, Russia; 21.Indian Inst Management Ahmedabad, Publ Syst Grp, Ahmadabad, Gujarat, India; 22.Natl Inst Environm Studies, 16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Roelfsema, Mark,van Soest, Heleen L.,Harmsen, Mathijs,et al. Taking stock of national climate policies to evaluate implementation of the Paris Agreement[J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS,2020,11(1). |
APA | Roelfsema, Mark.,van Soest, Heleen L..,Harmsen, Mathijs.,van Vuuren, Detlef P..,Bertram, Christoph.,...&Vishwanathan, Saritha Sudharmma.(2020).Taking stock of national climate policies to evaluate implementation of the Paris Agreement.NATURE COMMUNICATIONS,11(1). |
MLA | Roelfsema, Mark,et al."Taking stock of national climate policies to evaluate implementation of the Paris Agreement".NATURE COMMUNICATIONS 11.1(2020). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论