GSTDTAP  > 资源环境科学
DOI10.1289/EHP3871
Advancements in Life Cycle Human Exposure and Toxicity Characterization
Fantke, Peter1; Aylward, Lesa2; Bare, Jane3; Chiu, Weihsueh A.4; Dodson, Robin5; Dwyer, Robert6; Ernstoff, Alexi7; Howard, Brett8; Jantunen, Matti9; Jolliet, Olivier10; Judson, Richard11; Kirchhubel, Nienke1; Li, Dingsheng12; Miller, Aubrey13; Paoli, Greg14; Price, Paul11; Rhomberg, Lorenz15; Shen, Beverly16; Shin, Hyeong-Moo17; Teeguarden, Justin18; Vallero, Daniel11; Wambaugh, John11; Wetmore, Barbara A.11; Zaleski, Rosemary19; McKone, Thomas E.16
2018-12-01
发表期刊ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
ISSN0091-6765
EISSN1552-9924
出版年2018
卷号126期号:12
文章类型Article
语种英语
国家Denmark; Australia; USA; Switzerland; Finland; Canada
英文摘要

BACKGROUND: The Life Cycle Initiative, hosted at the United Nations Environment Programme, selected human toxicity impacts from exposure to chemical substances as an impact category that requires global guidance to overcome current assessment challenges. The initiative leadership established the Human Toxicity Task Force to develop guidance on assessing human exposure and toxicity impacts. Based on input gathered at three workshops addressing the main current scientific challenges and questions, the task force built a roadmap for advancing human toxicity characterization, primarily for use in life cycle impact assessment (LCIA).


OBJECTIVES: The present paper aims at reporting on the outcomes of the task force workshops along with interpretation of how these outcomes will impact the practice and reliability of toxicity characterization. The task force thereby focuses on two major issues that emerged from the workshops, namely considering near-field exposures and improving dose-response modeling.


DISCUSSION: The task force recommended approaches to improve the assessment of human exposure, including capturing missing exposure settings and human receptor pathways by coupling additional fate and exposure processes in consumer and occupational environments (near field) with existing processes in outdoor environments (far field). To quantify overall aggregate exposure, the task force suggested that environments be coupled using a consistent set of quantified chemical mass fractions transferred among environmental compartments. With respect to dose-response, the task force was concerned about the way LCIA currently characterizes human toxicity effects, and discussed several potential solutions. A specific concern is the use of a (linear) dose-response extrapolation to zero. Another concern addresses the challenge of identifying a metric for human toxicity impacts that is aligned with the spatiotemporal resolution of present LCIA methodology, yet is adequate to indicate health impact potential.


CONCLUSIONS: Further research efforts arc required based on our proposed set of recommendations for improving the characterization of human exposure and toxicity impacts in LCIA and other comparative assessment frameworks.


领域资源环境
收录类别SCI-E
WOS记录号WOS:000455204500011
WOS关键词COMPARATIVE RISK-ASSESSMENT ; NEAR-FIELD EXPOSURE ; IMPACT ASSESSMENT ; PARTICULATE MATTER ; ORGANIC-CHEMICALS ; GLOBAL BURDEN ; SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS ; INTAKE FRACTION ; PART 2 ; MODEL
WOS类目Environmental Sciences ; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health ; Toxicology
WOS研究方向Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health ; Toxicology
引用统计
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/24078
专题资源环境科学
作者单位1.Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Management Engn, Quantitat Sustainabil Assessment Div, Lyngby, Denmark;
2.Univ Queensland, Natl Ctr Environm Toxicol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia;
3.US EPA, Cincinnati, OH 45268 USA;
4.Texas A&M Univ, Dept Vet Integrat Biosci, College Stn, TX USA;
5.Silent Spring Inst, Newton, MA USA;
6.Int Copper Assoc, New York, NY USA;
7.Quantis, Lausanne, Switzerland;
8.Amer Chem Council, Washington, DC USA;
9.Natl Inst Hlth & Welf, Dept Environm Hlth, Kuopio, Finland;
10.Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA;
11.US EPA, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA;
12.Univ Nevada, Sch Community Hlth Sci, Reno, NV 89557 USA;
13.NIEHS, Bethesda, MD USA;
14.Risk Sci Int, Ottawa, ON, Canada;
15.Gradient, Cambridge, MA USA;
16.Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Publ Hlth, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA;
17.Univ Texas Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019 USA;
18.Pacific Northwest Natl Lab, Hlth Effects & Exposure Sci, Richland, WA USA;
19.ExxonMobil Biomed Sci Inc, Annandale, NJ USA
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Fantke, Peter,Aylward, Lesa,Bare, Jane,et al. Advancements in Life Cycle Human Exposure and Toxicity Characterization[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES,2018,126(12).
APA Fantke, Peter.,Aylward, Lesa.,Bare, Jane.,Chiu, Weihsueh A..,Dodson, Robin.,...&McKone, Thomas E..(2018).Advancements in Life Cycle Human Exposure and Toxicity Characterization.ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES,126(12).
MLA Fantke, Peter,et al."Advancements in Life Cycle Human Exposure and Toxicity Characterization".ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES 126.12(2018).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Fantke, Peter]的文章
[Aylward, Lesa]的文章
[Bare, Jane]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Fantke, Peter]的文章
[Aylward, Lesa]的文章
[Bare, Jane]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Fantke, Peter]的文章
[Aylward, Lesa]的文章
[Bare, Jane]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。