Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.1289/EHP3871 |
Advancements in Life Cycle Human Exposure and Toxicity Characterization | |
Fantke, Peter1; Aylward, Lesa2; Bare, Jane3; Chiu, Weihsueh A.4; Dodson, Robin5; Dwyer, Robert6; Ernstoff, Alexi7; Howard, Brett8; Jantunen, Matti9; Jolliet, Olivier10; Judson, Richard11; Kirchhubel, Nienke1; Li, Dingsheng12; Miller, Aubrey13; Paoli, Greg14; Price, Paul11; Rhomberg, Lorenz15; Shen, Beverly16; Shin, Hyeong-Moo17; Teeguarden, Justin18; Vallero, Daniel11; Wambaugh, John11; Wetmore, Barbara A.11; Zaleski, Rosemary19; McKone, Thomas E.16 | |
2018-12-01 | |
发表期刊 | ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
![]() |
ISSN | 0091-6765 |
EISSN | 1552-9924 |
出版年 | 2018 |
卷号 | 126期号:12 |
文章类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | Denmark; Australia; USA; Switzerland; Finland; Canada |
英文摘要 | BACKGROUND: The Life Cycle Initiative, hosted at the United Nations Environment Programme, selected human toxicity impacts from exposure to chemical substances as an impact category that requires global guidance to overcome current assessment challenges. The initiative leadership established the Human Toxicity Task Force to develop guidance on assessing human exposure and toxicity impacts. Based on input gathered at three workshops addressing the main current scientific challenges and questions, the task force built a roadmap for advancing human toxicity characterization, primarily for use in life cycle impact assessment (LCIA). OBJECTIVES: The present paper aims at reporting on the outcomes of the task force workshops along with interpretation of how these outcomes will impact the practice and reliability of toxicity characterization. The task force thereby focuses on two major issues that emerged from the workshops, namely considering near-field exposures and improving dose-response modeling. DISCUSSION: The task force recommended approaches to improve the assessment of human exposure, including capturing missing exposure settings and human receptor pathways by coupling additional fate and exposure processes in consumer and occupational environments (near field) with existing processes in outdoor environments (far field). To quantify overall aggregate exposure, the task force suggested that environments be coupled using a consistent set of quantified chemical mass fractions transferred among environmental compartments. With respect to dose-response, the task force was concerned about the way LCIA currently characterizes human toxicity effects, and discussed several potential solutions. A specific concern is the use of a (linear) dose-response extrapolation to zero. Another concern addresses the challenge of identifying a metric for human toxicity impacts that is aligned with the spatiotemporal resolution of present LCIA methodology, yet is adequate to indicate health impact potential. CONCLUSIONS: Further research efforts arc required based on our proposed set of recommendations for improving the characterization of human exposure and toxicity impacts in LCIA and other comparative assessment frameworks. |
领域 | 资源环境 |
收录类别 | SCI-E |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000455204500011 |
WOS关键词 | COMPARATIVE RISK-ASSESSMENT ; NEAR-FIELD EXPOSURE ; IMPACT ASSESSMENT ; PARTICULATE MATTER ; ORGANIC-CHEMICALS ; GLOBAL BURDEN ; SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS ; INTAKE FRACTION ; PART 2 ; MODEL |
WOS类目 | Environmental Sciences ; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health ; Toxicology |
WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health ; Toxicology |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/24078 |
专题 | 资源环境科学 |
作者单位 | 1.Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Management Engn, Quantitat Sustainabil Assessment Div, Lyngby, Denmark; 2.Univ Queensland, Natl Ctr Environm Toxicol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia; 3.US EPA, Cincinnati, OH 45268 USA; 4.Texas A&M Univ, Dept Vet Integrat Biosci, College Stn, TX USA; 5.Silent Spring Inst, Newton, MA USA; 6.Int Copper Assoc, New York, NY USA; 7.Quantis, Lausanne, Switzerland; 8.Amer Chem Council, Washington, DC USA; 9.Natl Inst Hlth & Welf, Dept Environm Hlth, Kuopio, Finland; 10.Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA; 11.US EPA, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA; 12.Univ Nevada, Sch Community Hlth Sci, Reno, NV 89557 USA; 13.NIEHS, Bethesda, MD USA; 14.Risk Sci Int, Ottawa, ON, Canada; 15.Gradient, Cambridge, MA USA; 16.Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Publ Hlth, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA; 17.Univ Texas Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019 USA; 18.Pacific Northwest Natl Lab, Hlth Effects & Exposure Sci, Richland, WA USA; 19.ExxonMobil Biomed Sci Inc, Annandale, NJ USA |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Fantke, Peter,Aylward, Lesa,Bare, Jane,et al. Advancements in Life Cycle Human Exposure and Toxicity Characterization[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES,2018,126(12). |
APA | Fantke, Peter.,Aylward, Lesa.,Bare, Jane.,Chiu, Weihsueh A..,Dodson, Robin.,...&McKone, Thomas E..(2018).Advancements in Life Cycle Human Exposure and Toxicity Characterization.ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES,126(12). |
MLA | Fantke, Peter,et al."Advancements in Life Cycle Human Exposure and Toxicity Characterization".ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES 126.12(2018). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论