Traditional Procurement versus Public–Private Partnership: A Comparison of Procurement Modalities Focusing on Bundling Contract Effects

GSTDTAP > 气候变化

DOI	10.22617/WPS189560-2
	Traditional Procurement versus Public–Private Partnership: A Comparison of Procurement Modalities Focusing on Bundling Contract Effects
	[unavailable]
	2018-09-26
出版年	2018
语种	英语
国家	国际
领域	气候变化
英文摘要	This study explores an optimal structure of procurement contracts between public and private partners by comparing traditional procurement and public–private partnerships. The study sets up a principal–agent model, focusing on bundling effects of procurement, and shows that this effect is one of the main sources of efficiency gains for PPPs. An examination of the PPP project data reveals that the efficiency gain has not been fully realized in the Republic of Korea due to the imbalanced contract participation of different types of investors. Contents Introduction Theoretical Models of Procurement Contracts Empirical Analysis of Public–Private Partnership Projects in the Republic of Korea Conclusion
URL	查看原文
来源平台	Asian Development Bank
引用统计
文献类型	科技报告
条目标识符	http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/235992
专题	气候变化
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	[unavailable]. Traditional Procurement versus Public–Private Partnership: A Comparison of Procurement Modalities Focusing on Bundling Contract Effects,2018.