GSTDTAP  > 气候变化
DOI10.1016/j.foreco.2018.01.016
Validation of allometric biomass models: How to have confidence in the application of existing models
Paul, Keryn I.1,2; Radtke, Philip J.3; Roxburgh, Stephen H.1,2; Larmour, John1,2; Waterworth, Robert4; Butler, Don5; Brooksbank, Kim6; Ximenes, Fabiano7
2018-03-15
发表期刊FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
ISSN0378-1127
EISSN1872-7042
出版年2018
卷号412页码:70-79
文章类型Article
语种英语
国家Australia; USA
英文摘要

The development of biomass estimation models is highly resource intensive as it generally entails harvesting (or excavating) trees of a range of sizes to determine dry weight of above-ground (or below-ground) biomass. To maximise the cost effectiveness of such sampling, guidance is required on whether an allometric model that already exists is suitable for a new site or species, or whether further sampling and model development is necessary.


With the aim to provide such guidance, we collated 12 pairs of well-sampled (N > 50) data sets of the same species at two sites, or two species at the same site. These provided case studies for: (i) assessing alternative statistical approaches to validate the application of a model developed using one data set to predict biomass of independent data from another site or species, and (ii) applying scenario analyses to explore the impact of sample size on uncertainty of validation, e.g. minimising type I and type II errors.


Our results indicate that although an allometric model for a given species or plant functional type may be applied across multiple sites, validation will be important when an existing generic multi-site and multi-species model is applied to a new species. Results obtained demonstrated that an independent sample size of N 15 frequently (37-46% of the time) provides insufficient power to avoid incorrectly accepting "validation" (type II errors). Hence, to ensure a useful outcome from resources spent in sampling biomass, it is recommended that at least 50 trees be sampled for each species. An equivalence test may then be applied to determine if the minimum detectable negligible difference between the existing model and the new independent data is < 25% (or whichever threshold is deemed acceptable). If so, the new data set may then be combined with existing data to refine a generalised model, which may then be applied with confidence. If not, then the resources expended need not be wasted as the sample size is sufficient to develop a new model suitable for application to the specific species sampled.


英文关键词Allometry Above ground biomass Bias Carbon sequestration Eucalyptus Verification
领域气候变化
收录类别SCI-E
WOS记录号WOS:000427667700008
WOS关键词EQUIVALENCE ; TREE
WOS类目Forestry
WOS研究方向Forestry
引用统计
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/23466
专题气候变化
作者单位1.CSIRO Agr, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia;
2.CSIRO Land & Water, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia;
3.Virginia Tech, Forest Resources & Environm Conservat, 319E Cheatham Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA;
4.Mullion Grp, 2a Fitzroy Rd, Forrest, ACT 2603, Australia;
5.Queensland Dept Sci Informat Technol Innovat & Ar, Mt Coot Tha Rd, Toowong, Qld 4066, Australia;
6.Dept Agr & Food, Private Mail Bag 50, Esperance, WA 6450, Australia;
7.Dept Primary Ind, Locked Bag 5123, Parramatta, NSW 2150, Australia
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Paul, Keryn I.,Radtke, Philip J.,Roxburgh, Stephen H.,et al. Validation of allometric biomass models: How to have confidence in the application of existing models[J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT,2018,412:70-79.
APA Paul, Keryn I..,Radtke, Philip J..,Roxburgh, Stephen H..,Larmour, John.,Waterworth, Robert.,...&Ximenes, Fabiano.(2018).Validation of allometric biomass models: How to have confidence in the application of existing models.FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT,412,70-79.
MLA Paul, Keryn I.,et al."Validation of allometric biomass models: How to have confidence in the application of existing models".FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT 412(2018):70-79.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Paul, Keryn I.]的文章
[Radtke, Philip J.]的文章
[Roxburgh, Stephen H.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Paul, Keryn I.]的文章
[Radtke, Philip J.]的文章
[Roxburgh, Stephen H.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Paul, Keryn I.]的文章
[Radtke, Philip J.]的文章
[Roxburgh, Stephen H.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。