GSTDTAP
DOI10.1111/gcb.14887
Afforestation for climate change mitigation: Potentials, risks and trade-offs
Doelman, Jonathan C.1,2; Stehfest, Elke1; van Vuuren, Detlef P.1,2; Tabeau, Andrzej3; Hof, Andries F.1,2; Braakhekke, Maarten C.4; Gernaat, David E. H. J.1,2; van den Berg, Maarten1; van Zeist, Willem-Jan1; Daioglou, Vassilis1,2; van Meijl, Hans3; Lucas, Paul L.1,2
2019-11-29
发表期刊GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
ISSN1354-1013
EISSN1365-2486
出版年2019
文章类型Article;Early Access
语种英语
国家Netherlands
英文摘要

Afforestation is considered a cost-effective and readily available climate change mitigation option. In recent studies afforestation is presented as a major solution to limit climate change. However, estimates of afforestation potential vary widely. Moreover, the risks in global mitigation policy and the negative trade-offs with food security are often not considered. Here we present a new approach to assess the economic potential of afforestation with the IMAGE 3.0 integrated assessment model framework. In addition, we discuss the role of afforestation in mitigation pathways and the effects of afforestation on the food system under increasingly ambitious climate targets. We show that afforestation has a mitigation potential of 4.9 GtCO(2)/year at 200 US$/tCO(2) in 2050 leading to large-scale application in an SSP2 scenario aiming for 2 degrees C (410 GtCO(2) cumulative up to 2100). Afforestation reduces the overall costs of mitigation policy. However, it may lead to lower mitigation ambition and lock-in situations in other sectors. Moreover, it bears risks to implementation and permanence as the negative emissions are increasingly located in regions with high investment risks and weak governance, for example in Sub-Saharan Africa. Afforestation also requires large amounts of land (up to 1,100 Mha) leading to large reductions in agricultural land. The increased competition for land could lead to higher food prices and an increased population at risk of hunger. Our results confirm that afforestation has substantial potential for mitigation. At the same time, we highlight that major risks and trade-offs are involved. Pathways aiming to limit climate change to 2 degrees C or even 1.5 degrees C need to minimize these risks and trade-offs in order to achieve mitigation sustainably.


英文关键词afforestation climate change mitigation food security integrated assessment land-based mitigation negative emissions
领域气候变化 ; 资源环境
收录类别SCI-E
WOS记录号WOS:000499783000001
WOS关键词CARBON SEQUESTRATION ; INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT ; BIOMASS ENERGY ; GLOBAL FORESTS ; EMISSIONS ; IMPACTS ; LAND ; ECOSYSTEM ; COSTS ; MODEL
WOS类目Biodiversity Conservation ; Ecology ; Environmental Sciences
WOS研究方向Biodiversity & Conservation ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
引用统计
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/225292
专题环境与发展全球科技态势
作者单位1.PBL Netherlands Environm Assessment Agcy, POB 30314, NL-2500 GH The Hague, Netherlands;
2.Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Utrecht, Netherlands;
3.Wageningen Univ & Res, Wageningen Econ Res, The Hague, Netherlands;
4.Wageningen Univ & Res, Wageningen Environm Res, The Hague, Netherlands
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Doelman, Jonathan C.,Stehfest, Elke,van Vuuren, Detlef P.,et al. Afforestation for climate change mitigation: Potentials, risks and trade-offs[J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY,2019.
APA Doelman, Jonathan C..,Stehfest, Elke.,van Vuuren, Detlef P..,Tabeau, Andrzej.,Hof, Andries F..,...&Lucas, Paul L..(2019).Afforestation for climate change mitigation: Potentials, risks and trade-offs.GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY.
MLA Doelman, Jonathan C.,et al."Afforestation for climate change mitigation: Potentials, risks and trade-offs".GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY (2019).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Doelman, Jonathan C.]的文章
[Stehfest, Elke]的文章
[van Vuuren, Detlef P.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Doelman, Jonathan C.]的文章
[Stehfest, Elke]的文章
[van Vuuren, Detlef P.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Doelman, Jonathan C.]的文章
[Stehfest, Elke]的文章
[van Vuuren, Detlef P.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。