GSTDTAP
DOI10.1029/2019GL085567
Biomass Burning Unlikely to Account for Missing Source of Carbonyl Sulfide
Stinecipher, J. R.1,2; Cameron-Smith, P. J.2; Blake, N. J.3; Kuai, L.4; Lejeune, B.5; Mahieu, E.5; Simpson, I. J.3; Campbell, J. E.6
2019-12-28
发表期刊GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
ISSN0094-8276
EISSN1944-8007
出版年2019
文章类型Article;Early Access
语种英语
国家USA; Belgium
英文摘要

Carbonyl sulfide (OCS) provides a proxy for measuring photosynthesis and is the primary background source of stratospheric aerosols. OCS emissions due to biomass burning are a variable and substantial (over 10%) part of the current OCS budget. OCS emission ratios from open burning fires, coupled with 1997-2016 data from the Global Fire Emissions Database (GFED4), yield OCS biomass burning emissions with a global average annual flux of 60 +/- 37 Gg(S) year(-1). A global box model suggests these emissions are more consistent with observations from global atmospheric composition monitoring networks than fluxes derived from previous synthesis papers. Even after considering the uncertainty in emission factor observations for each category of emissions and the interannual variation in total burned dry matter, the total OCS emissions from open burning are insufficient to account for the large imbalance between current estimates of global OCS sources and sinks.


英文关键词carbonyl sulfide biomass burning emission factor emission ratio forest fire trace gases
领域气候变化
收录类别SCI-E
WOS记录号WOS:000504592500001
WOS关键词ANTHROPOGENIC EMISSIONS INVENTORY ; TRACE GASES ; FIRE EMISSIONS ; DIMETHYL SULFIDE ; GLOBAL SOURCES ; DISULFIDE CS2 ; AEROSOLS ; OCS ; FOREST ; CO
WOS类目Geosciences, Multidisciplinary
WOS研究方向Geology
引用统计
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/225261
专题环境与发展全球科技态势
作者单位1.Univ Calif, Environm Syst Grad Grp, Merced, CA 95343 USA;
2.Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Atmospher Earth & Energy Div, Livermore, CA 94550 USA;
3.Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Chem, Irvine, CA 92717 USA;
4.CALTECH, Jet Prop Lab, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA;
5.Univ Liege, Inst Astrophys & Geophys, Liege, Belgium;
6.Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Environm Studies Dept, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Stinecipher, J. R.,Cameron-Smith, P. J.,Blake, N. J.,et al. Biomass Burning Unlikely to Account for Missing Source of Carbonyl Sulfide[J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS,2019.
APA Stinecipher, J. R..,Cameron-Smith, P. J..,Blake, N. J..,Kuai, L..,Lejeune, B..,...&Campbell, J. E..(2019).Biomass Burning Unlikely to Account for Missing Source of Carbonyl Sulfide.GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS.
MLA Stinecipher, J. R.,et al."Biomass Burning Unlikely to Account for Missing Source of Carbonyl Sulfide".GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS (2019).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Stinecipher, J. R.]的文章
[Cameron-Smith, P. J.]的文章
[Blake, N. J.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Stinecipher, J. R.]的文章
[Cameron-Smith, P. J.]的文章
[Blake, N. J.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Stinecipher, J. R.]的文章
[Cameron-Smith, P. J.]的文章
[Blake, N. J.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。