Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.1029/2019GL085567 |
Biomass Burning Unlikely to Account for Missing Source of Carbonyl Sulfide | |
Stinecipher, J. R.1,2; Cameron-Smith, P. J.2; Blake, N. J.3; Kuai, L.4; Lejeune, B.5; Mahieu, E.5; Simpson, I. J.3; Campbell, J. E.6 | |
2019-12-28 | |
发表期刊 | GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS |
ISSN | 0094-8276 |
EISSN | 1944-8007 |
出版年 | 2019 |
文章类型 | Article;Early Access |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | USA; Belgium |
英文摘要 | Carbonyl sulfide (OCS) provides a proxy for measuring photosynthesis and is the primary background source of stratospheric aerosols. OCS emissions due to biomass burning are a variable and substantial (over 10%) part of the current OCS budget. OCS emission ratios from open burning fires, coupled with 1997-2016 data from the Global Fire Emissions Database (GFED4), yield OCS biomass burning emissions with a global average annual flux of 60 +/- 37 Gg(S) year(-1). A global box model suggests these emissions are more consistent with observations from global atmospheric composition monitoring networks than fluxes derived from previous synthesis papers. Even after considering the uncertainty in emission factor observations for each category of emissions and the interannual variation in total burned dry matter, the total OCS emissions from open burning are insufficient to account for the large imbalance between current estimates of global OCS sources and sinks. |
英文关键词 | carbonyl sulfide biomass burning emission factor emission ratio forest fire trace gases |
领域 | 气候变化 |
收录类别 | SCI-E |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000504592500001 |
WOS关键词 | ANTHROPOGENIC EMISSIONS INVENTORY ; TRACE GASES ; FIRE EMISSIONS ; DIMETHYL SULFIDE ; GLOBAL SOURCES ; DISULFIDE CS2 ; AEROSOLS ; OCS ; FOREST ; CO |
WOS类目 | Geosciences, Multidisciplinary |
WOS研究方向 | Geology |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/225261 |
专题 | 环境与发展全球科技态势 |
作者单位 | 1.Univ Calif, Environm Syst Grad Grp, Merced, CA 95343 USA; 2.Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Atmospher Earth & Energy Div, Livermore, CA 94550 USA; 3.Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Chem, Irvine, CA 92717 USA; 4.CALTECH, Jet Prop Lab, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA; 5.Univ Liege, Inst Astrophys & Geophys, Liege, Belgium; 6.Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Environm Studies Dept, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Stinecipher, J. R.,Cameron-Smith, P. J.,Blake, N. J.,et al. Biomass Burning Unlikely to Account for Missing Source of Carbonyl Sulfide[J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS,2019. |
APA | Stinecipher, J. R..,Cameron-Smith, P. J..,Blake, N. J..,Kuai, L..,Lejeune, B..,...&Campbell, J. E..(2019).Biomass Burning Unlikely to Account for Missing Source of Carbonyl Sulfide.GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS. |
MLA | Stinecipher, J. R.,et al."Biomass Burning Unlikely to Account for Missing Source of Carbonyl Sulfide".GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS (2019). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论