GSTDTAP
DOI10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117666
Soil and forest regeneration after different extraction methods in coppice forests
Venanzi, Rachele1,2; Picchio, Rodolfo1; Grigolato, Stefano2; Latterini, Francesco1
2019-12-15
发表期刊FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
ISSN0378-1127
EISSN1872-7042
出版年2019
卷号454
文章类型Article
语种英语
国家Italy
英文摘要

Coppice is considered the oldest form of sustainable forest management in the Mediterranean area. Generally, it produces rapidly woody biomass and environmental benefits. This research was implemented through an experimental design based on two steps: analyzing the impact of silvicultural treatment (coppice with standards) and logging on forest soil and tree regeneration. It included the soil and regeneration recovery capacity of forests managed as coppice related to different logging systems and treatments applied over a six-year period. The findings demonstrated that tree species regeneration composition was not affected by silvicultural treatment and only slightly by harvesting system. Instead, the physical, chemical and biological soil features were only marginally affected by the silvicultural treatment applied, but strongly impacted by harvesting operations, with clear differences between the systems. The least damaging harvesting system was TLS (Tree Length System) followed by FTS (Full Tree System) and SWS (Short Wood System) that showed a more intense impact. This trend started only six months after harvesting and continued for more than 36 months post-harvesting in a lesser dynamic. The recovery of coppicing was almost complete 36 months after harvesting, without substantial differences between logging systems. Recovery from logging showed a clear positive trend, but 52 months after harvesting only the TLS area had completely recovered. For FTS and SWS, recovery occurred but was very weak.


英文关键词Logging operation Tree diversity Soil impact Biological soil quality Turkey oak Resilience
领域气候变化
收录类别SCI-E
WOS记录号WOS:000500372100006
WOS关键词CERRIS L. COPPICE ; IMPACT ; COMPACTION ; PRODUCTIVITY ; GROWTH ; OPERATIONS ; STANDS ; MANAGEMENT ; PATTERNS ; DAMAGE
WOS类目Forestry
WOS研究方向Forestry
引用统计
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/224804
专题环境与发展全球科技态势
作者单位1.Tuscia Univ, Dept Agr & Forestry Sci DAFNE, Via S Camillo de Lellis, I-01100 Viterbo, Italy;
2.Univ Padua, Dept Land Environm Agr & Forestry, Viale Univ 16, I-35020 Legnaro, PD, Italy
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Venanzi, Rachele,Picchio, Rodolfo,Grigolato, Stefano,et al. Soil and forest regeneration after different extraction methods in coppice forests[J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT,2019,454.
APA Venanzi, Rachele,Picchio, Rodolfo,Grigolato, Stefano,&Latterini, Francesco.(2019).Soil and forest regeneration after different extraction methods in coppice forests.FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT,454.
MLA Venanzi, Rachele,et al."Soil and forest regeneration after different extraction methods in coppice forests".FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT 454(2019).
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Venanzi, Rachele]的文章
[Picchio, Rodolfo]的文章
[Grigolato, Stefano]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Venanzi, Rachele]的文章
[Picchio, Rodolfo]的文章
[Grigolato, Stefano]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Venanzi, Rachele]的文章
[Picchio, Rodolfo]的文章
[Grigolato, Stefano]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。