GSTDTAP  > 气候变化
DOI10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.033
Electricity generation technologies: Comparison of materials use, energy return on investment, jobs creation and CO2 emissions reduction
Kis, Zoltan1; Pandya, Nikul1; Koppelaar, Rembrandt H. E. M.2
2018-09-01
发表期刊ENERGY POLICY
ISSN0301-4215
EISSN1873-6777
出版年2018
卷号120页码:144-157
文章类型Article
语种英语
国家England
英文摘要

Shifting to a low-carbon electricity future requires up-to-date information on the energetic, environmental and socio-economic performance of technologies. Here, we present a novel comprehensive bottom-up process chain framework that is applied to 19 electricity generation technologies, consistently incorporating 12 life-cycle phases from extraction to decommissioning. For each life-cycle phase of each technology the following 4 key metrics were assessed: material consumption, energy return ratios, job requirements and greenhouse gas emissions. We also calculate a novel global electricity to grid average for these metrics and present a metric variability analysis by altering transport distance, load factors, efficiency, and fuel density per technology. This work quantitatively supports model-to-policy frameworks that drive technology selection and investment based on energetic-economic viability, job creation and carbon emission reduction of technologies. The results suggest energetic-economic infeasibility of electricity generation networks with substantial shares of: i) liquefied natural gas transport, ii) long distance transport based hard and brown coal and pipeline natural gas, and iii) low-load factor solar-photovoltaic, concentrated solar power, onshore and offshore wind. Direct sector jobs can be expected to double in renewable-majority scenarios. All combustion-powered technologies without natural (bio-mass) or artificial carbon capture (fossil fuels) are not compatible with a low carbon electricity generation future.


英文关键词Electricity technology comparison Net electricity Electricity generation supply chain Electricity generation jobs Electricity generation greenhouse gas emissions
领域气候变化
收录类别SCI-E ; SSCI
WOS记录号WOS:000440123300014
WOS关键词LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT ; PHOTOVOLTAIC SOLAR-SYSTEMS ; INPUT-OUTPUT-ANALYSIS ; NATURAL-GAS ; MODERATE INSOLATION ; RENEWABLE ENERGY ; ASSESSMENT LCA ; BRIDGE FUEL ; EROI ; REGIONS
WOS类目Economics ; Energy & Fuels ; Environmental Sciences ; Environmental Studies
WOS研究方向Business & Economics ; Energy & Fuels ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
引用统计
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/19013
专题气候变化
作者单位1.Imperial Coll London, Dept Chem Engn, Fac Engn, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, England;
2.Scene Connect Ltd, 465c Hornsey Rd, London N19 4DR, England
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Kis, Zoltan,Pandya, Nikul,Koppelaar, Rembrandt H. E. M.. Electricity generation technologies: Comparison of materials use, energy return on investment, jobs creation and CO2 emissions reduction[J]. ENERGY POLICY,2018,120:144-157.
APA Kis, Zoltan,Pandya, Nikul,&Koppelaar, Rembrandt H. E. M..(2018).Electricity generation technologies: Comparison of materials use, energy return on investment, jobs creation and CO2 emissions reduction.ENERGY POLICY,120,144-157.
MLA Kis, Zoltan,et al."Electricity generation technologies: Comparison of materials use, energy return on investment, jobs creation and CO2 emissions reduction".ENERGY POLICY 120(2018):144-157.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Kis, Zoltan]的文章
[Pandya, Nikul]的文章
[Koppelaar, Rembrandt H. E. M.]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Kis, Zoltan]的文章
[Pandya, Nikul]的文章
[Koppelaar, Rembrandt H. E. M.]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Kis, Zoltan]的文章
[Pandya, Nikul]的文章
[Koppelaar, Rembrandt H. E. M.]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。