Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.1038/s41558-019-0584-8 |
Alternatives to genetic affinity as a context for within-species response to climate | |
Smith, Adam B.1; Beever, Erik A.2,3; Kessler, Aimee E.1; Johnston, Aaron N.2; Ray, Chris4; Epps, Clinton W.5; Lanier, Hayley C.6,7; Klinger, Rob C.8; Rodhouse, Thomas J.9; Varner, Johanna10; Perrine, John D.11; Seglund, Amy12; Hall, L. Embere13,14; Galbreath, Kurt15; MacGlover, Chris16; Billman, Peter17; Blatz, Gretchen18; Brewer, Jason19; Vardaro, Jessica Castillo20; Chalfoun, Anna D.21; Collins, Gail22; Craighead, April23; Curlis, Chris24; Daly, Christopher25; Doak, Daniel F.26; East, Mitch27; Edwards, Mark28; Erb, Liesl29; Ernest, Kristina A.30; Fauver, Brian31; Foresman, Kerry R.32; Goehring, Ken33; Hagar, Joan34; Hayes, Charles L.35; Henry, Philippe36; Hersey, Kimberly37; Hilty, Shannon L.3; Jacobson, Jim; Jeffress, Mackenzie R.38; Manning, Tom39; Masching, Amy31; Maxell, Bryce40; McCollough, Rayo41; McFarland, Corrie42; Miskow, Eric43; Morelli, Toni Lyn8; Moyer-Horner, Lucas44; Mueller, Megan45; Nugent, Martin46; Pratt, Beth47; Rasmussen-Flores, Mary48; Rickman, Tom H.42; Robison, Hillary49; Rodriguez, Arthur46; Rowe, Karen50; Rowe, Kevin51; Russello, Michael A.52; Saab, Vicki19; Schmidt, Angie53; Stewart, Joseph A. E.54; Stuart, James N.55; Svancara, Leona K.56; Thompson, Will3; Timmins, Julie57; Treinish, Gregg58; Waterhouse, Matthew D.52; Westover, Marie L.59; Wilkening, Jennifer60; Yandow, Leah61 | |
2019-10-01 | |
发表期刊 | NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE |
ISSN | 1758-678X |
EISSN | 1758-6798 |
出版年 | 2019 |
卷号 | 9期号:10页码:787-+ |
文章类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | USA; Canada; Australia |
英文摘要 | Accounting for within-species variability in the relationship between occurrence and climate is essential to forecasting species' responses to climate change. Few climate-vulnerability assessments explicitly consider intraspecific variation, and those that do typically assume that variability is best explained by genetic affinity. Here, we evaluate how well heterogeneity in responses to climate by a cold-adapted mammal, the American pika (Ochotona princeps), aligns with subdivisions of the geographic range by phylogenetic lineage, physiography, elevation or ecoregion. We find that variability in climate responses is most consistently explained by an ecoregional subdivision paired with background sites selected from a broad spatial extent indicative of long-term (millennial-scale) responses to climate. Our work challenges the common assumption that intraspecific variation in climate responses aligns with genetic affinity. Accounting for the appropriate context and scale of heterogeneity in species' responses to climate will be critical for informing climate-adaptation management strategies at the local (spatial) extents at which such actions are typically implemented. |
领域 | 资源环境 |
收录类别 | SCI-E ; SSCI |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000487830200021 |
WOS关键词 | PIKA OCHOTONA-PRINCEPS ; DISTRIBUTION MODELS IMPLICATIONS ; AMERICAN PIKA ; SELECTION ; SHIFTS ; ECOREGIONS ; EVOLUTION ; PATTERNS ; REVEALS ; REFUGIA |
WOS类目 | Environmental Sciences ; Environmental Studies ; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences |
WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/187529 |
专题 | 资源环境科学 |
作者单位 | 1.Missouri Bot Garden, Ctr Conservat & Sustainable Dev, St Louis, MO USA; 2.US Geol Survey, Northern Rocky Mt Sci Ctr, Bozeman, MT 59717 USA; 3.Montana State Univ, Dept Ecol, Bozeman, MT 59717 USA; 4.Univ Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309 USA; 5.Oregon State Univ, Dept Fisheries & Wildlife, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA; 6.Univ Oklahoma, Dept Biol, Norman, OK 73019 USA; 7.Univ Oklahoma, Sam Noble Museum, Norman, OK 73019 USA; 8.US Geol Survey, Western Ecol Res Ctr, Oakhurst, CA USA; 9.Natl Pk Serv, Inventory & Monitoring Program, Bend, OR USA; 10.Colorado Mesa Univ, Grand Junction, CO USA; 11.Calif Polytech State Univ San Luis Obispo, Dept Biol Sci, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 USA; 12.Colorado Pk & Wildlife, Montrose, CO USA; 13.Univ Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071 USA; 14.Wyoming Game & Fish Dept, Laramie, WY USA; 15.Northern Michigan Univ, Dept Biol, Marquette, MI USA; 16.Univ Wyoming, Dept Vet Sci, Laramie, WY 82071 USA; 17.Montana State Univ, Dept Earth Sci, Bozeman, MT 59717 USA; 18.Washington Dept Fish & Wildlife, Wildlife Sci Div, Olympia, WA USA; 19.US Forest Serv, Modoc Natl Forest, Alturas, CA USA; 20.San Jose State Univ, Dept Biol Sci, San Jose, CA 95192 USA; 21.US Geol Survey, Wyoming Cooperat Fish & Wildlife Res Unit, Laramie, WY USA; 22.US Fish & Wildlife Serv, Sheldon Hart Mt Natl Wildlife Refuge Complex, Lakeview, OR USA; 23.Craighead Inst, Bozeman, MT USA; 24.Calif Dept Fish & Wildlife, Rancho Cordova, CA USA; 25.Oregon State Univ, Dept Chem Biol & Environm Engn, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA; 26.Univ Colorado, Environm Studies Program, Boulder, CO 80309 USA; 27.Georgia Dept Nat Resources, Social Circle, GA USA; 28.Royal Alberta Museum, Edmonton, AB, Canada; 29.Warren Wilson Coll, Biol & Environm Studies, Swannanoa, NC USA; 30.Cent Washington Univ, Ellensburg, WA USA; 31.Denver Zoo, Denver, CO USA; 32.Univ Montana, Div Biol Sci, Missoula, MT 59812 USA; 33.Coll Siskiyous, Weed, CA USA; 34.US Geol Survey, Forest & Rangeland Ecosyst Sci Ctr, Corvallis, OR USA; 35.New Mexico Dept Game & Fish, Ecol & Environm Planning Div, Santa Fe, NM USA; 36.Univ Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC, Canada; 37.Utah Div Wildlife Resources, Salt Lake City, UT USA; 38.Nevada Dept Wildlife, Elko, NV USA; 39.Oregon State Univ, Dept Forest Ecosyst & Soc, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA; 40.Montana Nat Heritage Program, Helena, MT USA; 41.Univ New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA; 42.US Forest Serv, Lassen Natl Forest, Susanville, CA USA; 43.Nevada Nat Heritage Program, Carson City, NV USA; 44.Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA; 45.Rocky Mt Wild, Denver, CO USA; 46.Oregon Dept Fish & Wildlife, Salem, OR USA; 47.Natl Wildlife Federat, Midpines, CA USA; 48.US Forest Serv, Modoc Natl Forest, Cedarville, CA USA; 49.Natl Pk Serv, Yellowstone Ctr Resources, Mammoth Hot Springs, WY USA; 50.Museums Victoria, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; 51.Museums Victoria, Sci Dept, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; 52.Univ British Columbia, Dept Biol, Kelowna, BC, Canada; 53.Idaho Dept Fish & Game, Boise, ID USA; 54.Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA; 55.New Mexico Dept Game & Fish, Santa Fe, NM USA; 56.Idaho Dept Fish & Game, Moscow, ID USA; 57.Pk Canada, Banff, AB, Canada; 58.Adventure Scientists, Bozeman, MT USA; 59.Univ New Mexico, Dept Biol, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA; 60.US Fish & Wildlife Serv, Las Vegas, NV USA; 61.Bur Land Management, Lander, WY USA |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Smith, Adam B.,Beever, Erik A.,Kessler, Aimee E.,et al. Alternatives to genetic affinity as a context for within-species response to climate[J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE,2019,9(10):787-+. |
APA | Smith, Adam B..,Beever, Erik A..,Kessler, Aimee E..,Johnston, Aaron N..,Ray, Chris.,...&Yandow, Leah.(2019).Alternatives to genetic affinity as a context for within-species response to climate.NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE,9(10),787-+. |
MLA | Smith, Adam B.,et al."Alternatives to genetic affinity as a context for within-species response to climate".NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE 9.10(2019):787-+. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论