GSTDTAP  > 气候变化
DOI10.1111/gcb.14747
How ecologists define drought, and why we should do better
Slette, Ingrid J.1,2; Post, Alison K.1,2; Awad, Mai2,3; Even, Trevor2,4; Punzalan, Arianna2,3,4; Williams, Sere1; Smith, Melinda D.1,2; Knapp, Alan K.1,2
2019-07-19
发表期刊GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
ISSN1354-1013
EISSN1365-2486
出版年2019
卷号25期号:10页码:3193-3200
文章类型Article
语种英语
国家USA
英文摘要

Drought, widely studied as an important driver of ecosystem dynamics, is predicted to increase in frequency and severity globally. To study drought, ecologists must define or at least operationalize what constitutes a drought. How this is accomplished in practice is unclear, particularly given that climatologists have long struggled to agree on definitions of drought, beyond general variants of "an abnormal deficiency of water." We conducted a literature review of ecological drought studies (564 papers) to assess how ecologists describe and study drought. We found that ecologists characterize drought in a wide variety of ways (reduced precipitation, low soil moisture, reduced streamflow, etc.), but relatively few publications (similar to 32%) explicitly define what are, and are not, drought conditions. More troubling, a surprising number of papers (similar to 30%) simply equated "dry conditions" with "drought" and provided little characterization of the drought conditions studied. For a subset of these, we calculated Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index values for the reported drought periods. We found that while almost 90% of the studies were conducted under conditions quantifiable as slightly to extremely drier than average, similar to 50% were within the range of normal climatic variability. We conclude that the current state of the ecological drought literature hinders synthesis and our ability to draw broad ecological inferences because drought is often declared but is not explicitly defined or well characterized. We suggest that future drought publications provide at least one of the following: (a) the climatic context of the drought period based on long-term records; (b) standardized climatic index values; (c) published metrics from drought-monitoring organizations; (d) a quantitative definition of what the authors consider to be drought conditions for their system. With more detailed and consistent quantification of drought conditions, comparisons among studies can be more rigorous, increasing our understanding of the ecological effects of drought.


英文关键词climate drought literature review precipitation SPEI
领域气候变化 ; 资源环境
收录类别SCI-E
WOS记录号WOS:000478223200001
WOS关键词PRECIPITATION EVAPOTRANSPIRATION INDEX ; TIME-SCALES ; DISTRIBUTED EXPERIMENTS ; GLOBAL PATTERNS ; VEGETATION ; EXTREMES ; CHINA ; DEFINITION ; FRAMEWORK ; IMPACTS
WOS类目Biodiversity Conservation ; Ecology ; Environmental Sciences
WOS研究方向Biodiversity & Conservation ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
引用统计
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/185177
专题气候变化
资源环境科学
作者单位1.Colorado State Univ, Dept Biol, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA;
2.Colorado State Univ, Grad Degree Program Ecol, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA;
3.Colorado State Univ, Dept Ecosyst Sci & Sustainabil, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA;
4.Colorado State Univ, Nat Resources Ecol Lab, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Slette, Ingrid J.,Post, Alison K.,Awad, Mai,et al. How ecologists define drought, and why we should do better[J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY,2019,25(10):3193-3200.
APA Slette, Ingrid J..,Post, Alison K..,Awad, Mai.,Even, Trevor.,Punzalan, Arianna.,...&Knapp, Alan K..(2019).How ecologists define drought, and why we should do better.GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY,25(10),3193-3200.
MLA Slette, Ingrid J.,et al."How ecologists define drought, and why we should do better".GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY 25.10(2019):3193-3200.
条目包含的文件
条目无相关文件。
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[Slette, Ingrid J.]的文章
[Post, Alison K.]的文章
[Awad, Mai]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[Slette, Ingrid J.]的文章
[Post, Alison K.]的文章
[Awad, Mai]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[Slette, Ingrid J.]的文章
[Post, Alison K.]的文章
[Awad, Mai]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。