Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.5194/acp-18-16099-2018 |
Is there an aerosol signature of chemical cloud processing? | |
Ervens, Barbara1,2,10; Sorooshian, Armin3,4; Aldhaif, Abdulmonam M.3; Shingler, Taylor5,6; Crosbie, Ewan5,6; Ziemba, Luke6; Campuzano-Jost, Pedro2,7; Jimenez, Jose L.2,7; Wisthaler, Armin8,9 | |
2018-11-08 | |
发表期刊 | ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
![]() |
ISSN | 1680-7316 |
EISSN | 1680-7324 |
出版年 | 2018 |
卷号 | 18期号:21页码:16099-16119 |
文章类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | USA; Norway; Austria; France |
英文摘要 | The formation of sulfate and secondary organic aerosol mass in the aqueous phase (aqSOA) of cloud and fog droplets can significantly contribute to ambient aerosol mass. While tracer compounds give evidence that aqueousphase processing occurred, they do not reveal the extent to which particle properties have been modified in terms of mass, chemical composition, hygroscopicity, and oxidation state. We analyze data from several field experiments and model studies for six air mass types (urban, biogenic, marine, wild fire biomass burning, agricultural biomass burning, and background air) using aerosol size and composition measurements for particles 13-850 nm in diameter. We focus on the trends of changes in mass, hygroscopicity parameter K, and oxygen-to-carbon (O / C) ratio due to chemical cloud processing. We find that the modification of these parameters upon cloud processing is most evident in urban, marine, and biogenic air masses, i.e., air masses that are more polluted than very clean air (background air) but cleaner than heavily polluted plumes as encountered during biomass burning. Based on these trends, we suggest that the mass ratio (R-tot) of the potential aerosol sulfate and aqSOA mass to the initial aerosol mass can be used to predict whether chemical cloud processing will be detectable. Scenarios in which this ratio exceeds R-tot similar to 0.5 are the most likely ones in which clouds can significantly change aerosol parameters. It should be noted that the absolute value of R-tot depends on the considered size range of particles. R-tot is dominated by the addition of sulfate (R-sulf) in all scenarios due to the more efficient conversion of SO2 to sulfate compared to aqSOA formation from organic gases. As the formation processes of aqSOA are still poorly understood, the estimate of R-aqSOA is likely associated with large uncertainties. Comparison to R-tot values as calculated for ambient data at different locations validates the applicability of the concept to predict a chemical cloud-processing signature in selected air masses. |
领域 | 地球科学 |
收录类别 | SCI-E |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000449556900006 |
WOS关键词 | SECONDARY ORGANIC AEROSOL ; SOUTHEAST UNITED-STATES ; MARINE BOUNDARY-LAYER ; DICARBOXYLIC-ACIDS ; OXALIC-ACID ; HYGROSCOPIC PROPERTIES ; SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS ; INORGANIC AEROSOL ; ALPHA-DICARBONYLS ; SULFATE FORMATION |
WOS类目 | Environmental Sciences ; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences |
WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/18371 |
专题 | 地球科学 |
作者单位 | 1.NOAA, ESRL, Chem Sci Div, Boulder, CO 80305 USA; 2.Univ Colorado, CIRES, Boulder, CO 80309 USA; 3.Univ Arizona, Dept Chem & Environm Engn, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA; 4.Univ Arizona, Dept Hydrol & Atmospher Sci, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA; 5.Sci Syst & Applicat Inc, Hampton, VA USA; 6.NASA, Langley Res Ctr, Hampton, VA 23665 USA; 7.Univ Colorado, Dept Chem, Boulder, CO 80309 USA; 8.Univ Oslo, Dept Chem, Oslo, Norway; 9.Univ Innsbruck, Inst Ion Phys & Appl Phys, Innsbruck, Austria; 10.Univ Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, SIGMA Clermont, Inst Chim Clermont Ferrand, Clermont Ferrand, France |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Ervens, Barbara,Sorooshian, Armin,Aldhaif, Abdulmonam M.,et al. Is there an aerosol signature of chemical cloud processing?[J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS,2018,18(21):16099-16119. |
APA | Ervens, Barbara.,Sorooshian, Armin.,Aldhaif, Abdulmonam M..,Shingler, Taylor.,Crosbie, Ewan.,...&Wisthaler, Armin.(2018).Is there an aerosol signature of chemical cloud processing?.ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS,18(21),16099-16119. |
MLA | Ervens, Barbara,et al."Is there an aerosol signature of chemical cloud processing?".ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS 18.21(2018):16099-16119. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论