Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.1029/2018JD028859 |
Comparison of Global Downscaled Versus Bottom-Up Fossil Fuel CO2 Emissions at the Urban Scale in Four US Urban Areas | |
Gurney, Kevin R.1; 39;Keeffe, D.2 | |
2019-03-16 | |
发表期刊 | JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES |
ISSN | 2169-897X |
EISSN | 2169-8996 |
出版年 | 2019 |
卷号 | 124期号:5页码:2823-2840 |
文章类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | USA |
英文摘要 | Spatiotemporally resolved urban fossil fuel CO2 (FFCO2) emissions are critical to urban carbon cycle research and urban climate policy. Two general scientific approaches have been taken to estimate spatiotemporally explicit urban FFCO2 fluxes, referred to here as "downscaling" and "bottom-up." Bottom-up approaches can specifically characterize the CO2-emitting infrastructure in cities but are labor-intensive to build and currently available in few U.S. cities. Downscaling approaches, often available globally, require proxy information to allocate or distribute emissions resulting in additional uncertainty. We present a comparison of a downscaled FFCO2 emission data product (Open-source Data Inventory for Anthropogenic CO2 (ODIAC)) to a bottom-up estimate (Hestia) in four U.S. urban areas in an effort to better isolate and understand differences between the approaches. We find whole-city differences ranging from -1.5% (Los Angeles Basin) to +20.8% (Salt Lake City). At the 1 km x 1 km spatial scale, comparisons reveal a low-emission limit in ODIAC driven by saturation of the nighttime light spatial proxy. At this resolution, the median difference between the two approaches ranged from 47 to 84% depending upon city with correlations ranging from 0.34 to 0.68. The largest discrepancies were found for large point sources and the on-road sector, suggesting that downscaled FFCO2 data products could be improved by incorporating independent large point-source estimates and estimating on-road sources with a relevant spatial surrogate. Progressively coarsening the spatial resolution improves agreement but greater than approximately 25 km(2), there were diminishing returns to agreement suggesting a practical resolution when using downscaled approaches. |
英文关键词 | fossil fuel CO2 urban downscaled bottom-up uncertainty mitigation |
领域 | 气候变化 |
收录类别 | SCI-E ; SSCI |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000462139800025 |
WOS关键词 | CARBON-DIOXIDE EMISSIONS ; SPATIAL-DISTRIBUTION ; ANTHROPOGENIC CO2 ; SURFACE FLUX ; QUANTIFICATION ; CONSUMPTION ; INVENTORY ; ENERGY ; METHODOLOGY ; UNCERTAINTY |
WOS类目 | Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences |
WOS研究方向 | Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/181689 |
专题 | 气候变化 |
作者单位 | 1.No Arizona Univ, Sch Informat Comp & Cyber Syst, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA; 2.Arizona State Univ, Sch Life Sci, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA; 3.Arizona State Univ, Sch Geog Sci & Urban Planning, Tempe, AZ USA; 4.Univ Michigan, Sch Environm & Sustainabil, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Gurney, Kevin R.,39;Keeffe, D.. Comparison of Global Downscaled Versus Bottom-Up Fossil Fuel CO2 Emissions at the Urban Scale in Four US Urban Areas[J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES,2019,124(5):2823-2840. |
APA | Gurney, Kevin R.,&39;Keeffe, D..(2019).Comparison of Global Downscaled Versus Bottom-Up Fossil Fuel CO2 Emissions at the Urban Scale in Four US Urban Areas.JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES,124(5),2823-2840. |
MLA | Gurney, Kevin R.,et al."Comparison of Global Downscaled Versus Bottom-Up Fossil Fuel CO2 Emissions at the Urban Scale in Four US Urban Areas".JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES 124.5(2019):2823-2840. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论