Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.5194/acp-18-3185-2018 |
Results from the Fourth WMO Filter Radiometer Comparison for aerosol optical depth measurements | |
Kazadzis, Stelios1,11; Kouremeti, Natalia1; Diemoz, Henri2; Grobner, Julian1; Forgan, Bruce W.3; Campanelli, Monica4; Estelles, Victor5; Lantz, Kathleen; Michalsky, Joseph6; Carlund, Thomas6,7; Cuevas, Emilio8; Toledano, Carlos9; Becker, Ralf10; Nyeki, Stephan1; Kosmopoulos, Panagiotis G.11; Tatsiankou, Viktar12; Vuilleumier, Laurent13; Denn, Frederick M.14; Ohkawara, Nozomu15; Ijima, Osamu15; Goloub, Philippe16; Raptis, Panagiotis I.1,11; Milner, Michael; Behrens, Klaus10; Barreto, Africa8,9,17; Martucci, Giovanni13; Hall, Emiel6; Wendell, James6; Fabbri, Bryan E.14; Wehrli, Christoph1 | |
2018-03-06 | |
发表期刊 | ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
![]() |
ISSN | 1680-7316 |
EISSN | 1680-7324 |
出版年 | 2018 |
卷号 | 18期号:5页码:3185-3201 |
文章类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | Switzerland; Italy; Australia; Spain; USA; Sweden; Germany; Greece; Canada; Japan; France |
英文摘要 | This study presents the results of the Fourth Filter Radiometer Comparison that was held in Davos, Switzerland, between 28 September and 16 October 2015. Thirty filter radiometers and spectroradiometers from 12 countries participated including reference instruments from global aerosol networks. The absolute differences of all instruments compared to the reference have been based on the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) criterion defined as follows: "95% of the measured data has to be within 0.005 +/- 0.001/m " (where m is the air mass). At least 24 out of 29 instruments achieved this goal at both 500 and 865 nm, while 12 out of 17 and 13 out of 21 achieved this at 368 and 412 nm, respectively. While searching for sources of differences among different instruments, it was found that all individual differences linked to Rayleigh, NO2, ozone, water vapor calculations and related optical depths and air mass calculations were smaller than 0.01 in aerosol optical depth (AOD) at 500 and 865 nm. Different cloud-detecting algorithms used have been compared. Angstrom exponent calculations showed relatively large differences among different instruments, partly because of the high calculation uncertainty of this parameter in low AOD conditions. The overall low deviations of these AOD results and the high accuracy of reference aerosol network instruments demonstrated a promising framework to achieve homogeneity, compatibility and harmonization among the different spectral AOD networks in the near future. |
领域 | 地球科学 |
收录类别 | SCI-E |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000426906400002 |
WOS关键词 | ABSORPTION CROSS-SECTIONS ; SENSING REFERENCE DATA ; IN-SITU CALIBRATION ; QUALITY-CONTROL ; NETWORK ; AERONET ; PHOTOMETER ; INSTRUMENT ; CLIMATOLOGY ; PERFORMANCE |
WOS类目 | Environmental Sciences ; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences |
WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/17333 |
专题 | 地球科学 |
作者单位 | 1.World Radiat Ctr, Phys Meteorol Observatorium Davos, Davos, Switzerland; 2.Aria & Atmosfera Radiaz Solare & Atmosfera ARPA V, I-11020 St Christophe, Italy; 3.Bur Meteorol, Stand & Metrol, Docklands, Vic 3008, Australia; 4.SACI CNR, Via Fosso Cavaliere 100, I-00133 Rome, Italy; 5.Univ Valencia, Dept Earth Phys & Thermodynam, Solar Radiat & Res Unit, Valencia, Spain; 6.NOAA ESRL GMD, Cooperat Inst Res Environm Studies, Boulder, CO 80305 USA; 7.Swedish Meteorol & Hydrol Inst, S-60176 Norrkoping, Sweden; 8.State Meteorol Agcy AEMET, Izana Atmospher Res Ctr, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Spain; 9.Univ Valladolid, Atmospher Opt Grp GOA, E-47011 Valladolid, Spain; 10.Deutscher Wetterdienst Meteorol Observatorium Lin, D-15848 Tauche, Germany; 11.Natl Observ Athens, Inst Environm Res & Sustainable Dev, Athens, Greece; 12.COFOVO Energy Inc, 800 King Edward Ave,Suite 3014, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada; 13.Fed Off Meteorol & Climatol MeteoSwiss, Payerne, Switzerland; 14.Sci Syst & Applicat Inc, NASA, Langley Sci Directorate, Hampton, VA 23666 USA; 15.Japan Meteorol Agcy, Chiyoda Ku, 1-3-4 Otemachi, Tokyo 1008122, Japan; 16.Univ Sci & Technol Lille, Lab Opt Atmospher, F-159655 Villeneuve Dascq, France; 17.Cimel Elect, F-75011 Paris, France |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Kazadzis, Stelios,Kouremeti, Natalia,Diemoz, Henri,et al. Results from the Fourth WMO Filter Radiometer Comparison for aerosol optical depth measurements[J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS,2018,18(5):3185-3201. |
APA | Kazadzis, Stelios.,Kouremeti, Natalia.,Diemoz, Henri.,Grobner, Julian.,Forgan, Bruce W..,...&Wehrli, Christoph.(2018).Results from the Fourth WMO Filter Radiometer Comparison for aerosol optical depth measurements.ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS,18(5),3185-3201. |
MLA | Kazadzis, Stelios,et al."Results from the Fourth WMO Filter Radiometer Comparison for aerosol optical depth measurements".ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS 18.5(2018):3185-3201. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论