Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.1111/gcb.13455 |
Can knowledge-based N management produce more staple grain with lower greenhouse gas emission and reactive nitrogen pollution? A meta-analysis | |
Xia, Longlong1,2; Lam, Shu Kee2; Chen, Deli2; Wang, Jinyang1; Tang, Quan1; Yan, Xiaoyuan1 | |
2017-05-01 | |
发表期刊 | GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
![]() |
ISSN | 1354-1013 |
EISSN | 1365-2486 |
出版年 | 2017 |
卷号 | 23期号:5 |
文章类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | Peoples R China; Australia |
英文摘要 | Knowledge-based nitrogen (N) management, which is designed for a better synchronization of crop N demand with N supply, is critical for global food security and environmental sustainability. Yet, a comprehensive assessment on how these N management practices affect food production, greenhouse gas emission (GHG), and N pollution in China is lacking. We compiled the results of 376 studies (1166 observations) to evaluate the overall effects of seven knowledge-based N management practices on crop productivity, nitrous oxide (N2O) emission, and major reactive N (Nr) losses (ammonia, NH3; N leaching and runoff), for staple grain (rice, wheat, and corn) production in China. These practices included the application of controlled-release N fertilizer, nitrification inhibitor (NI) and urease inhibitor (UI), higher splitting frequency of fertilizer N application, lower basal N fertilizer (BF) proportion, deep placement of N fertilizer, and optimal N rate based on soil N test. Our results showed that, compared to traditional N management, these knowledge-based N practices significantly increased grain yields by 1.3-10.0%, which is attributed to the higher aboveground N uptake (5.1-12.1%) and N use efficiency in grain (8.0-48.2%). Moreover, these N management practices overall reduced GHG emission and Nr losses, by 5.4-39.8% for N2O emission, 30.7-61.5% for NH3 emission (except for the NI application), 13.6-37.3% for N leaching, and 15.5-45.0% for N runoff. The use of NI increased NH3 emission by 27.5% (9.0-56.0%), which deserves extra-attention. The cost and benefit analysis indicated that the yield profit of these N management practices exceeded the corresponding input cost, which resulted in a significant increase of the net economic benefit by 2.9-12.6%. These results suggest that knowledge-based N management practice can be considered an effective way to ensure food security and improve environmental sustainability, while increasing economic return. |
英文关键词 | cost and benefit grain yield greenhouse gas knowledge-based N management reactive N losses |
领域 | 气候变化 ; 资源环境 |
收录类别 | SCI-E |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000397800600014 |
WOS关键词 | REDUCING ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ; CROP SYSTEM MANAGEMENT ; NITRIFICATION INHIBITORS ; AGRICULTURAL SOILS ; USE EFFICIENCY ; RECENT TRENDS ; PRODUCTIVITY ; MITIGATION ; CHINA ; FERTILIZERS |
WOS类目 | Biodiversity Conservation ; Ecology ; Environmental Sciences |
WOS研究方向 | Biodiversity & Conservation ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/17024 |
专题 | 气候变化 资源环境科学 |
作者单位 | 1.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Soil Sci, State Key Lab Soil & Sustainable Agr, Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu, Peoples R China; 2.Univ Melbourne, Fac Vet & Agr Sci, Crop & Soil Sci Sect, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Xia, Longlong,Lam, Shu Kee,Chen, Deli,et al. Can knowledge-based N management produce more staple grain with lower greenhouse gas emission and reactive nitrogen pollution? A meta-analysis[J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY,2017,23(5). |
APA | Xia, Longlong,Lam, Shu Kee,Chen, Deli,Wang, Jinyang,Tang, Quan,&Yan, Xiaoyuan.(2017).Can knowledge-based N management produce more staple grain with lower greenhouse gas emission and reactive nitrogen pollution? A meta-analysis.GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY,23(5). |
MLA | Xia, Longlong,et al."Can knowledge-based N management produce more staple grain with lower greenhouse gas emission and reactive nitrogen pollution? A meta-analysis".GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY 23.5(2017). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论