Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.02.011 |
How Do Multi-criteria Assessments Address Landscape-level Problems? A Review of Studies and Practices | |
Allain, Sandrine; Plumecocq, Gaeel; Leenhardt, Delphine | |
2017-06-01 | |
发表期刊 | ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS |
ISSN | 0921-8009 |
EISSN | 1873-6106 |
出版年 | 2017 |
卷号 | 136 |
文章类型 | Review |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | France |
英文摘要 | Viewing the landscape as a spatialized social-ecological system allows identification of specific management challenges: integration of multiple views, multiple levels of organization, complex spatial-temporal patterns and uncertainties. Multi-criteria assessments (MCAs), which allow the comparison of alternative actions when multiple interests collide, are considered adequate to support landscape management. However, there is no consensus about how they should be applied and can integrate both multiple views and spatial dimension. We conducted an extensive quantitative and qualitative literature review targeting MCAs with a participatory and spatial approach. Our results suggest that (1) for sustainability assessments, participatory and spatial approaches endorse different rationales and hybrid methods are not so common; (2) within those methods, only scenario selection methods (as opposed to design methods) can integrate spatially-explicit, spatially-implicit, place specific, and overall values; and (3) current applications, which aggregate values ignoring their spatial and social distribution, do not coincide with the nature of landscape-management challenges. In addition, they give little importance to the structuration of information and to collective deliberation. We conclude that, in the absence of a good match between spatiality and participation, MCAs should, for now, be handled as insightful but distorted tools to explore and structure landscape-level management problems. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. |
英文关键词 | Landscape management Integrated assessment Spatialization Participation Social-ecological system |
领域 | 资源环境 |
收录类别 | SCI-E ; SSCI |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000397693100026 |
WOS关键词 | SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS ; NATURAL-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ; CRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS ; POST-NORMAL SCIENCE ; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES ; CROPPING SYSTEMS ; SUSTAINABILITY ; SUPPORT ; RESILIENCE ; PERSPECTIVE |
WOS类目 | Ecology ; Economics ; Environmental Sciences ; Environmental Studies |
WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Business & Economics |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/15564 |
专题 | 资源环境科学 |
作者单位 | Toulouse Univ, INRA, INPT, INP EI PURPAN,AGIR, BP 52627, F-31326 Castanet Tolosan, France |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Allain, Sandrine,Plumecocq, Gaeel,Leenhardt, Delphine. How Do Multi-criteria Assessments Address Landscape-level Problems? A Review of Studies and Practices[J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS,2017,136. |
APA | Allain, Sandrine,Plumecocq, Gaeel,&Leenhardt, Delphine.(2017).How Do Multi-criteria Assessments Address Landscape-level Problems? A Review of Studies and Practices.ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS,136. |
MLA | Allain, Sandrine,et al."How Do Multi-criteria Assessments Address Landscape-level Problems? A Review of Studies and Practices".ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS 136(2017). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论