Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.002 |
Relationships Between Ecosystem Services: Comparing Methods for Assessing Tradeoffs and Synergies | |
Vallet, Ameline1,2,3; Locatelli, Bruno2,3; Levrel, Harold1; Wunder, Sven3; Seppelt, Ralf4; Scholes, Robert J.5; Oszwald, Johan6 | |
2018-08-01 | |
发表期刊 | ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS |
ISSN | 0921-8009 |
EISSN | 1873-6106 |
出版年 | 2018 |
卷号 | 150页码:96-106 |
文章类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | France; Peru; Germany; South Africa |
英文摘要 | Understanding the interactions between the multiple ecosystem services (ES) which can be delivered from a single landscape is essential. Most studies on ES relationships use spatial or temporal statistical analysis (for example: correlations between services). Methods from microeconomic theory have recently received attention for describing ES relationships. The nature and intensity of ES relationships can be assessed by fitting a production possibility frontier that indicates the maximum amount of one ES that can be produced by landscape, for different levels of another ES. This study estimates production frontiers empirically, and compares the ES relationships insights gained this way with those inferred from correlation approaches. InVEST software was used to model and map the provision of six ES in the Reventazon watershed in Costa Rica. Spatial and temporal ES correlation patterns were analyzed for four observed land uses/land covers (LULC). Production frontiers were constructed using a set of 32 simulated scenarios. Production frontier was the most sensitive method for detecting ES relationships. The nature and intensity of ES relationships revealed depended on the analytic methods used. In comparison with correlations, the production frontier approach provided additional information relating to tradeoff intensity and Pareto efficient LULC configurations. |
领域 | 资源环境 |
收录类别 | SCI-E ; SSCI |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000444364000009 |
WOS关键词 | LAND-USE PATTERNS ; SCENARIO ANALYSIS ; DECISION-MAKING ; OFF ANALYSIS ; OPTIMIZATION METHODOLOGY ; ECONOMIC VALUATION ; LANDSCAPE CHANGE ; DRIVING FORCES ; CONSERVATION ; BIODIVERSITY |
WOS类目 | Ecology ; Economics ; Environmental Sciences ; Environmental Studies |
WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Business & Economics |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/15393 |
专题 | 资源环境科学 |
作者单位 | 1.Univ Paris Saclay, Ecole Ponts ParisTech, AgroParisTech, CIRED,Cirad,CNRS,EHESS, F-94130 Nogent Sur Marne, France; 2.Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, Res Unit Forests & Soc, F-34398 Montpellier, France; 3.CIFOR, Av La Molina 1895, Lima, Peru; 4.UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Computat Landscape Ecol, Permoserstr 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany; 5.Univ Witwatersrand, Global Change Inst, ZA-2050 Johannesburg, South Africa; 6.Univ Rennes 2, Unite Mixte Rech, LETG Rennes COSTEL, CNRS 6554, F-35043 Rennes, France |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Vallet, Ameline,Locatelli, Bruno,Levrel, Harold,et al. Relationships Between Ecosystem Services: Comparing Methods for Assessing Tradeoffs and Synergies[J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS,2018,150:96-106. |
APA | Vallet, Ameline.,Locatelli, Bruno.,Levrel, Harold.,Wunder, Sven.,Seppelt, Ralf.,...&Oszwald, Johan.(2018).Relationships Between Ecosystem Services: Comparing Methods for Assessing Tradeoffs and Synergies.ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS,150,96-106. |
MLA | Vallet, Ameline,et al."Relationships Between Ecosystem Services: Comparing Methods for Assessing Tradeoffs and Synergies".ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS 150(2018):96-106. |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论