Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment
DOI | 10.1088/1748-9326/aa7250 |
The critical role of the routing scheme in simulating peak river discharge in global hydrological models | |
Zhao, Fang1; Veldkamp, Ted I. E.2; Frieler, Katja1; Schewe, Jacob1; Ostberg, Sebastian1,3; Willner, Sven1; Schauberger, Bernhard1,4; Gosling, Simon N.5; Schmied, Hannes Mueller6,7; Portmann, Felix T.6; Leng, Guoyong8; Huang, Maoyi8; Liu, Xingcai; Tang, Qiuhong9; Hanasaki, Naota10; Biemans, Hester11,12; Gerten, Dieter1; Satoh, Yusuke13; Pokhrel, Yadu14; Stacke, Tobias15; Ciais, Philippe4; Chang, Jinfeng4; Ducharne, Agnes16; Guimberteau, Matthieu4; Wada, Yoshihide13,17,18,19; Kim, Hyungjun20; Yamazaki, Dai19,21 | |
2017-07-01 | |
发表期刊 | ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS |
ISSN | 1748-9326 |
出版年 | 2017 |
卷号 | 12期号:7 |
文章类型 | Article |
语种 | 英语 |
国家 | Germany; Netherlands; France; England; USA; Peoples R China; Japan; Austria |
英文摘要 | Global hydrological models (GHMs) have been applied to assess global flood hazards, but their capacity to capture the timing and amplitude of peak river discharge-which is crucial in flood simulations-has traditionally not been the focus of examination. Here we evaluate to what degree the choice of river routing scheme affects simulations of peak discharge and may help to provide better agreement with observations. To this end we use runoff and discharge simulations of nine GHMs forced by observational climate data (1971-2010) within the ISIMIP2a project. The runoff simulations were used as input for the global river routing model CaMa-Flood. The simulated daily discharge was compared to the discharge generated by each GHM using its native river routing scheme. For each GHM both versions of simulated discharge were compared to monthly and daily discharge observations from 1701 GRDC stations as a benchmark. CaMaFlood routing shows a general reduction of peak river discharge and a delay of about two to three weeks in its occurrence, likely induced by the buffering capacity of floodplain reservoirs. For a majority of river basins, discharge produced by CaMa-Flood resulted in a better agreement with observations. In particular, maximum daily discharge was adjusted, with a multi-model averaged reduction in bias over about 2/3 of the analysed basin area. The increase in agreement was obtained in both managed and near-natural basins. Overall, this study demonstrates the importance of routing scheme choice in peak discharge simulation, where CaMa-Flood routing accounts for floodplain storage and backwater effects that are not represented in most GHMs. Our study provides important hints that an explicit parameterisation of these processes may be essential in future impact studies. |
英文关键词 | ISIMIP global hydrological models peak river discharge river routing flood daily runoff GRDC |
领域 | 气候变化 |
收录类别 | SCI-E |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000404943800003 |
WOS关键词 | FLOOD HAZARD ; CONTINENTAL-SCALE ; INTEGRATED MODEL ; RUNOFF ; AMAZON ; PRECIPITATION ; BASIN ; UNCERTAINTIES ; VELOCITY ; SYSTEMS |
WOS类目 | Environmental Sciences ; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences |
WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences |
引用统计 | |
文献类型 | 期刊论文 |
条目标识符 | http://119.78.100.173/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/15089 |
专题 | 气候变化 |
作者单位 | 1.Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res, Potsdam, Germany; 2.Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Environm Studies IVM, Amsterdam, Netherlands; 3.Humboldt Univ, Geog Dept, Berlin, Germany; 4.Lab Sci Climat & Environm, Gif Sur Yvette, France; 5.Univ Nottingham, Sch Geog, Nottingham, England; 6.Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Inst Phys Geog, Frankfurt, Germany; 7.Senckenberg Biodivers & Climate Res Ctr BiK F, Frankfurt, Germany; 8.Pacific Northwest Natl Lab, Atmospher Sci & Global Change Div, Richland, WA 99352 USA; 9.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Water Cycle & Related Land Surface Proc, Beijing, Peoples R China; 10.Natl Inst Environm Studies, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan; 11.Wageningen Univ & Res Ctr, Earth Syst Sci & Climate Change, Wageningen, Netherlands; 12.Environm Assessment Agcy, Bilthoven, Netherlands; 13.Int Inst Appl Syst Anal, Laxenburg, Austria; 14.Michigan State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA; 15.Max Planck Inst Meteorol, Bundesstr 53, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany; 16.Sorbonne Univ, UPMC, CNRS, UMR 71619,METIS,EPHE, Paris, France; 17.Columbia Univ, Ctr Climate Syst Res, New York, NY USA; 18.NASA, Goddard Inst Space Studies, New York, NY 10025 USA; 19.Univ Utrecht, Dept Phys Geog, Utrecht, Netherlands; 20.Univ Tokyo, Inst Ind Sci, Tokyo, Japan; 21.Japan Agcy Marine Earth Sci & Technol, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Zhao, Fang,Veldkamp, Ted I. E.,Frieler, Katja,et al. The critical role of the routing scheme in simulating peak river discharge in global hydrological models[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS,2017,12(7). |
APA | Zhao, Fang.,Veldkamp, Ted I. E..,Frieler, Katja.,Schewe, Jacob.,Ostberg, Sebastian.,...&Yamazaki, Dai.(2017).The critical role of the routing scheme in simulating peak river discharge in global hydrological models.ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS,12(7). |
MLA | Zhao, Fang,et al."The critical role of the routing scheme in simulating peak river discharge in global hydrological models".ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS 12.7(2017). |
条目包含的文件 | 条目无相关文件。 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论